thumbnail of Patently Offensive: Porn Under Siege
Transcript
Hide -
<v Bystanders>Pornography would be anything that is deviant in nature and corrupt. <v Bystanders>It's pure filth. <v Bystander>For me taste is the issue when you look at pornography. <v Bystander>Because I-I would never associate myself with any type of bondage or-I <v Bystander>see those things as being sexually deviant and I think that's where you have to really <v Bystander>separate it from, you know, from mainstream. <v Bystander>I think a lot of very sort of average quote, normal people watch pornography. <v Bystander>It's amazing how many straight, you know, middle class people watch pornography. <v Bystander>It's society, in fact, and decadence in society, which has really made <v Bystander>pornography become probably more popular. <v Bystander>It's just hard to understand why intelligent people would want to even <v Bystander>look at these. <v Bystander>For me it's fine. I don't push it on anyone else um friends enjoy <v Bystander>it. It's something we all seem to have in common and we look at these <v Bystander>things. <v Bystander>Everyone's curious about what the other person's doing. <v Bystander>And also everyone wants to relate that's how they do it. <v Bystander>I can personally.
<v Bystander>It's an industry of greed and uh taking <v Bystander>abuse to its fullest form of commercial exploitation. <v Bystander>And of course, I'm aware there are significant First Amendment issues about pornography <v Bystander>in our country rests on freedom of speech. <v Bystander>I'd never want to be known as an opponent of the First Amendment or freedom of speech. <v Bystander>But I cannot be a mother and I cannot be a concerned feminist as I am, <v Bystander>and not be aware that so much of pornography today centers on the abuse of women, <v Bystander>the abuse of children, violence toward women and children. <v Narrator>Pornography. The word defies consensus definition. <v Narrator>The topic engages issues of individual rights, relationships, government <v Narrator>intervention in our private lives, the First Amendment and family values. <v Narrator>Social, political and technological developments have created a multi-billion <v Narrator>dollar sex industry. <v Narrator>What happens when society becomes a mass consumer of X-rated entertainment? <v Narrator>Competing human needs and values shape our attitudes about pornography's influence.
<v Narrator>In the battle for the cultural establishment, the intimate realm of human sexuality <v Narrator>has become a major public policy issue. <v Narrator>The porn wars reveal the irreconcilable tension between private conduct <v Narrator>and public consequence. <v Laird Sutton>Since man first began to record his environment and record <v Laird Sutton>himself, he has recorded human sexual functioning. <v Laird Sutton>Probably because it's one of the most powerful forces in his life <v Laird Sutton>and he has always depicted those forces that are powerful. <v Laird Sutton>He started by picking up pieces of charcoal off the <v Laird Sutton>ground in the caves when we lived in caves. <v Laird Sutton>We progressed to stone ceramic painting,
<v Laird Sutton>whatever medium was available to us as humans at all <v Laird Sutton>times in history. We've used that medium to represent <v Laird Sutton>human sexual functioning, to show ourselves and to show other people <v Laird Sutton>who we are sexually. Usually when we look back upon the <v Laird Sutton>representations of human sexual functioning, we tend to call <v Laird Sutton>it erotic art or erotica. <v Laird Sutton>Often it's just the period of time that separates the <v Laird Sutton>work and the judgment of the work <v Laird Sutton>that differentiates between erotic art and pornography. <v Laird Sutton>As movies begin to first make their appearance in Western society. <v Laird Sutton>Of course, one of the very first themes that was dealt with was human <v Laird Sutton>sexual functioning. So the movies that we have today of those early <v Laird Sutton>times come in the 1920s.
<v Laird Sutton>These loops were depictions of sexual events <v Laird Sutton>of sexual happenings. <v Laird Sutton>They grew out of the Depression era, they have a lot of humor <v Laird Sutton>in them. The audience that saw them were usually fraternal groups. <v Laird Sutton>One man would have a projector. <v Laird Sutton>He would take the projector and a number of loops and go to these organizations. <v Laird Sutton>These films constituted the only visual sex education <v Laird Sutton>material available to men at the time. <v Narrator>The 1950s were a time of traditional social mores, but <v Narrator>the restraints and innuendoes that characterized the entertainment of that decade <v Narrator>were replaced by ever more explicit themes and images. <v Narrator>[Music plays] <v Narrator>By the late 1960s, cultural changes of enormous magnitude fueled <v Narrator>production, sale and distribution of X-rated materials. <v Narrator>In 1970, a presidential commission examined research and porn samples
<v Narrator>of the era. It found pornography had no anti-social effects <v Narrator>and called for the repeal of most obscenity laws. <v Narrator>President Nixon denounced the report and called it morally bankrupt. <v Narrator>The report simultaneously demoralized law enforcement efforts to stem <v Narrator>a rising tide of porn and proved to be a Magna Carta for pornographers. <v Harry Reems>Nothing turns you off to sex. <v Linda Marciano>Doctor please, I'm not turned off to sex. I enjoy it. <v Linda Marciano>In fact I could spend the rest of my life getting laid. <v Laird Sutton>In 1972 when the film Deep Throat <v Laird Sutton>finally made it through the court. <v Laird Sutton>It literally opened the gates and made <v Laird Sutton>the erotic film making legitimate in the eyes, not only of the <v Laird Sutton>law, but in the eyes of the public. <v Harry Reems> Well there it is! You little bugger, there it is! <v Linda Marciano>What?
<v Harry Reems>Well, your clitoris. It's deep down in the bottom of your throat. <v Ralph Ginzburg>I try to give this country its first really high quality periodical <v Ralph Ginzburg>devoted to sex. It was back in 1962 at the beginning <v Ralph Ginzburg>or toward the middle of what we look back on as the sexual revolution. <v Ralph Ginzburg>America had always relegate the subject of sex to its grimiest newsstand <v Ralph Ginzburg>periodicals, and I tried to put out a hardcover mag-a book with contributions <v Ralph Ginzburg>by almost distinguished artists and writers, and in fact, I think I did succeed <v Ralph Ginzburg>artistically. <v Al Goldstein>To those wishing to return to a porn free world, I say it will never happen. <v Al Goldstein>The cat is already out of the bag. <v Al Goldstein>The horse is out and it won't help close the barn door. <v Al Goldstein>For my long association with adult entertainment, I can testify that its use <v Al Goldstein>cuts across demographic boundaries. <v Al Goldstein>School teachers buy adult entertainment, Senators do, and so do members of the clergy. <v Al Goldstein>And although to pretend otherwise may be comforting for some people, their pretense
<v Al Goldstein>has no place in the creation of public policy. <v Narrator>By the late 1970s, the entertainment landscape included close to 20,000 <v Narrator>adult bookstores and sex emporiums, more than 400 sexually <v Narrator>oriented magazines, close to 1,000 adult movie theaters. <v Narrator>Mainstream, soft and hardcore magazines were now available everywhere <v Narrator>and pornography was keeping pace with new technology. <v William Margold>Because of the incredible boom of videotape and the videotape <v William Margold>phenomena, mainstream society has rediscovered <v William Margold>us. We were, of course, in 1972 discovered with a film called Deep Throat, <v William Margold>but that you had to go to the theater to see. <v John Weston>We never get the opportunity to focus on what constitutes <v John Weston>overwhelmingly the preponderance of mainstream sexually <v John Weston>oriented material that is produced and distributed above the counter in the <v John Weston>United States. And this becomes particularly germane because technologically
<v John Weston>today, unquestionably the most significant factor in terms <v John Weston>of the medium of communication and the means of delivery of that medium of communication <v John Weston>is the video cassette industry. <v Frederick Schauer>Much of computer technology, cable technology, videotape <v Frederick Schauer>technology, telephones and so on. <v Frederick Schauer>Although they may not look like the traditional methods of distribution of pornographic <v Frederick Schauer>materials; nevertheless, deal with the instrumentalities <v Frederick Schauer>of interstate commerce. Many of them are regulated by the Federal Communications <v Frederick Schauer>Commission. The whole area is right now in flux, just reflecting the <v Frederick Schauer>simple fact that the law inevitably lags behind technology. <v Narrator>Not everyone embrace the new morality represented by porn's soaring profits. <v Narrator>Civic, religious and parent organizations pressed for enforcement of existing <v Narrator>zoning and obscenity laws. <v Narrator>Radical feminists charge that pornography contributed to the rise in violent
<v Narrator>crimes against women and children. <v Henry Hudson>This commission was formed by the attorney general of the United States at the <v Henry Hudson>recommendation of the President of the United States Ronald Reagan. <v Narrator>In response to a groundswell of public concern, a new commission on pornography <v Narrator>was formed in 1985, sometimes called the Meese Commission. <v Narrator>It sought and heard testimony about pornography at hearings around the country. <v Narrator>With the explosive popularity of the video cassette recorder. <v Narrator>Porn had entered homes across the nation. <v Narrator>Thousands of X-rated titles flooded a willing market, telephones, <v Narrator>computers, satellite and cable television, every instrument of <v Narrator>mass communication were now mediums for an avalanche of pornography. <v Narrator>The commission's mandate was to determine pornography's effects on society from <v Narrator>diverse perspectives. <v Captain James Docherty>Pornography is a major contributing factor in the sexual abuse of our children. <v Captain James Docherty>Hundreds of children ages 4 to 13 years have been victims of pedophiles
<v Captain James Docherty>and have been interviewed by investigators of the Los Angeles Police Department. <v Captain James Docherty>In more than 90 percent of the cases, pornography was utilized by the pedophile <v Captain James Docherty>to break down the inhibitions of the children. <v Lorilee Howard>At age 10, he began showing me or encouraging <v Lorilee Howard>me to look at pictures of nude women and <v Lorilee Howard>Playboy centerfolds, calenders, <v Lorilee Howard>pinups and that sort of thing. <v Lorilee Howard>Between the time I was 10 and 13, he gradually <v Lorilee Howard>kept reinforcing my going into the garage where he had a lot of his <v Lorilee Howard>nude pictures hanging up on the wall and where there were a lot of magazine-stripper <v Lorilee Howard>magazines as well as Playboy and Esquire and those kinds of magazines. <v Lorilee Howard>He had decks of playing cards with nude women on them. <v Lorilee Howard>There was a lot of sexual materials and <v Lorilee Howard>innuendo from him, jokes.
<v Lorilee Howard>He thought he was being cute, that he would tell me dirty jokes, and <v Lorilee Howard>I was supposed to be lucky because most adults and parents wouldn't say <v Lorilee Howard>those things to their kids. <v Lorilee Howard>He made a direct sexual overture to me when I was 13. <v Lorilee Howard>I feel it's direct because he wanted me to pose naked for him. <v Lorilee Howard>That's when he said, now I was ready to learn how <v Lorilee Howard>to be sexy-sexy and to pose and to take my clothes off in <v Lorilee Howard>front of adult men. The sexual abuse that he committed against me, which <v Lorilee Howard>started with exposing me to photographs <v Lorilee Howard>and ended with actual sexual intercourse. <v Lorilee Howard>I think he felt since women are by and large <v Lorilee Howard>to be used as sexual objects, and here is dozens of examples <v Lorilee Howard>of women being sexual objects. <v Lorilee Howard>That was the way in which he could say to himself it was OK for him to molest <v Lorilee Howard>me. My step father knew what he was doing was wrong,
<v Lorilee Howard>and what hurts me most of all is that knowing he was wrong, he did it anyway, <v Lorilee Howard>because he wanted to satisfy some need that was more important to him <v Lorilee Howard>than my being cared for as a child. <v Lorilee Howard>And that is a sin and a crime and bad and all those words <v Lorilee Howard>that are not psychiatric. <v Lorilee Howard>And it hurts. <v Captain James Docherty>The pornography trade is inherently attractive because of the high profits <v Captain James Docherty>and the very few legal risks. <v Captain James Docherty>Organized crime's annual gross profit from this industry is conservatively <v Captain James Docherty>estimated to exceed 4 billion dollars. <v Captain James Docherty>The influence of East Coast organized crime is now prevalent in all facets <v Captain James Docherty>of the California pornography industry. <v William P. Kelly>There are approximately 40,000, quote, legitimate videotape stores <v William P. Kelly>in the United States, approximately 80 percent of those sell or rent <v William P. Kelly>sexually explicit hardcore videotapes.
<v William P. Kelly>Do the owners know that they're dealing with organized crime? <v William P. Kelly>Some do, some don't. Those that know, many of them don't care. <v Narrator>Sexually violent themes in pornography magazines and even <v Narrator>R-rated films have fueled debates about their contribution to deviant behavior. <v Narrator>Even serial murders. <v Narrator>Are scenarios of sex paired with violence harmless, even cathartic? <v Narrator>Or are they instruments of perversion? <v Narrator>These questions defy simplistic answers. <v Park Elliott Dietz>There's a lot of controversy about the possible ways in which <v Park Elliott Dietz>media images could influence sexual deviations or could influence <v Park Elliott Dietz>sexual behavior. <v Park Elliott Dietz>There's a fair amount of support for a theory that sexual deviations are learned <v Park Elliott Dietz>and learned through a conditioning process. <v Park Elliott Dietz>In that respect, I would think that the kind of film that one <v Park Elliott Dietz>would want to worry most about if that theory is correct, would be those films that <v Park Elliott Dietz>show erotic scenes that would arouse the normal teenage boy
<v Park Elliott Dietz>and then show something terrible happened to the woman and scene, because that kind <v Park Elliott Dietz>of portrayal has the risk of making that young man become <v Park Elliott Dietz>aroused to the violence and to begin to respond <v Park Elliott Dietz>to violence as if that were sexy. <v Park Elliott Dietz>If a mad scientist wanted to find a way to raise <v Park Elliott Dietz>a generation of sexual sadists in America. <v Park Elliott Dietz>He could hardly do better at our present state of knowledge than to try <v Park Elliott Dietz>to expose a generation of teenage boys to films showing women <v Park Elliott Dietz>mutilated in the midst of a sexy scene. <v A. Nicholas Groth>When one works with sexual offenders and asks about the role <v A. Nicholas Groth>or the interest in pornography. <v A. Nicholas Groth>Sometimes you'll find, well, 60% of rapists or 80% <v A. Nicholas Groth>of rapists, or 50% to 60% of child molesters will acknowledge <v A. Nicholas Groth>an interest in pornography. What always strikes me about that is that seems awfully low. <v A. Nicholas Groth>Because I would think if we asked men in general what percentage of the male population
<v A. Nicholas Groth>has some interest in pornography, we'd expect it to be much higher than that. <v Andrea Dworkin>I'm suggesting not that all men are rapists <v Andrea Dworkin>in a biological sense or are biologically predetermined <v Andrea Dworkin>rapists, I don't believe that that's true. <v Andrea Dworkin>On the contrary, it's that pornography socializes men to rape. <v Andrea Dworkin>It's that pornography is such a strong socialize of gender. <v A. Nicholas Groth>Clearly, any type of sexual assault involves both sexuality and aggression. <v A. Nicholas Groth>But I think people tend to think of it is primarily the sexual <v A. Nicholas Groth>arousal and the aggression in service of meeting that sexual need, and <v A. Nicholas Groth>I'm not so sure. From 20 years work now with men who sexually <v A. Nicholas Groth>assault that that's a correct understanding about the nature or dynamics of sexual <v A. Nicholas Groth>assault. I think it's much more of the arousal of aggression and sexuality which is <v A. Nicholas Groth>experienced, it's something devalued or sexuality <v A. Nicholas Groth>which is degraded then becomes an expression of the aggression.
<v Captain James Docherty>A recent serial murder in a remote area of Northern California involved two <v Captain James Docherty>men who are suspected of murdering 20 people in a sex <v Captain James Docherty>torture fantasy. <v Captain James Docherty>The case involved a suspect's viewing sadomasochistic videotapes, torturing <v Captain James Docherty>their victims and photographing the murders. <v Captain James Docherty>When the murderers were apprehended, there was an abundance of pornographic material <v Captain James Docherty>of a nature in which they carried out their fantasies. <v Philip Nobile>I am aware that there is an FBI study of 36 serial killers <v Philip Nobile>that appears to make a connection between their reading habits, <v Philip Nobile>even suggesting that these serial killers may be porn addicts. <v Philip Nobile>And therefore, we ought to take a look, a closer look at pornography. <v Philip Nobile>Have not having read the study, but knowing how the FBI works, <v Philip Nobile>I simply don't trust their research. <v Philip Nobile>You can't win any sexual game with the FBI, and the reason I distrust this research <v Philip Nobile>is because they probably didn't look in the refrigerators of these serial killers
<v Philip Nobile>to see if they were eating a certain brand of yogurt or were they all subscribers to The <v Philip Nobile>New York Times. Merely because they found pornographic material says <v Philip Nobile>nothing about the cause of the murder. <v Philip Nobile>I argue that their interest in pornography is an effect of their sexual <v Philip Nobile>obsessions, not a cause. <v Park Elliott Dietz>One kind of magazine that hasn't usually been thought of as pornographic <v Park Elliott Dietz>and is widely available is a group of magazines known as the detective <v Park Elliott Dietz>magazines. The crimes that they report are selected <v Park Elliott Dietz>as being particularly sensational crimes. <v Park Elliott Dietz>We found that these magazines greatly overrepresent <v Park Elliott Dietz>sexual violence, they also show erotic images. <v Park Elliott Dietz>Often the woman who is bound has her skirt up or has <v Park Elliott Dietz>lace showing from a slip or a brasier or her blouse is torn, <v Park Elliott Dietz>and so these magazines show images that can be
<v Park Elliott Dietz>regarded as sexually arousing and indeed are to-to many males <v Park Elliott Dietz>and at the same time show women being abused. <v Park Elliott Dietz>There is no effort to control or limit the circulation of detective magazines <v Park Elliott Dietz>among the young. They're available at convenience stores, newsstands, <v Park Elliott Dietz>many other places, right along with the Hot Rod magazines, True Confession and so <v Park Elliott Dietz>on. <v A. Nicholas Groth>What I'm saying really is I can't tell offhand who are the people who <v A. Nicholas Groth>are adversely influenced by such stimulation, who find, for example, <v A. Nicholas Groth>crime detective magazines arousing and stimulating. <v A. Nicholas Groth>And then, if you will, incorporate what they read into their next crime. <v A. Nicholas Groth>I know there are such people, they have disclosed that to me in my work with them. <v A. Nicholas Groth>But I can-I would say if I were working with such a client, I would not encourage looking <v A. Nicholas Groth>at that material. I would say just as if you were diabetic, you should not contemplate <v A. Nicholas Groth>eating sweets, that's not good for your health.
<v A. Nicholas Groth>I would say, given the nature of your problems, you should not be exposing yourself to <v A. Nicholas Groth>this type of material that is not good for you. <v Narrator>Detective magazines, along with many soft and hardcore sexual materials, <v Narrator>are of concern to Women Against Pornography, a support group that believes <v Narrator>porn targets women for sexual abuse. <v Evalina Kane>One of the largest groups of women that we hear from are married women, for example, or <v Evalina Kane>women who live with men. <v Evalina Kane>These men collect pornography and by virtue of it being in the home, it's forced <v Evalina Kane>upon the women, and inevitably what happens is that the women <v Evalina Kane>are at first persuaded, and if that doesn't work coerced and eventually forced <v Evalina Kane>to enact the material and the pornography. <v Evalina Kane>One woman in particular, the husband was an avid collector <v Evalina Kane>of bondage pornography. The relationship ended finally when him and <v Evalina Kane>a neighbor assisted a dog in raping the wife. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>We consider this actual torture and it's part of an international trafficking
<v Dorchen Leidholdt>women that we're finding more and more in pornography. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>When we walk down to the Times Square pornography district, we'll see many, many <v Dorchen Leidholdt>photographs that show Asian women in similar poses. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>Some magazines are devoted exclusively to Asian women in bondage, and it's the most <v Dorchen Leidholdt>brutal pornography that we've seen. <v Andrea Dworkin>My name is Andrea Dworkin. <v Andrea Dworkin>I am a citizen of the United States. <v Andrea Dworkin>And in this country where I live every year, millions and millions of pictures <v Andrea Dworkin>are made of women with our legs spread. <v Andrea Dworkin>We're called beaver, we're called pussy, our genitals are tied up, they're <v Andrea Dworkin>pasted. Makeup is put on them to make them pop out of a page <v Andrea Dworkin>at a male viewer. <v Carole Vance>Pornography I think is a very bad term because we will use it in the belief we agree, and <v Carole Vance>no one has to ask the question, what does it mean? <v Carole Vance>So in my mental bubble, you know, I insert one thing in your mental bubble there's <v Carole Vance>another. And we all agree to condemn what kind of sexual explicit representation <v Carole Vance>we don't like. We think we agree and we probably don't.
<v Dorchen Leidholdt>We make a distinction between pornography and erotica. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>We define erotica as any kind of sexually explicit material <v Dorchen Leidholdt>premised on equality, mutuality, reciprocity. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>One of the unfortunate problems is the pornographers have a habit of calling a lot of the <v Dorchen Leidholdt>material they produce, that is very demeaning to women <v Dorchen Leidholdt>that subordinates women erotica. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>So there's a little bit of a problem with language there. <v Andrea Dworkin>I live in a country where if you film any act of humiliation <v Andrea Dworkin>or torture and if the victim is a woman, the film is both <v Andrea Dworkin>entertainment and it is protected speech. <v Andrea Dworkin>Now, that tells me something about what it means to be a woman citizen in this country <v Andrea Dworkin>and the meaning of being second class. <v Andrea Dworkin>When your rape is entertainment, your worthlessness is absolute. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>The problem with pornography is not the sexual-the fact that it's sexually explicit. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>The problem with pornography is it brings sex and inequality,
<v Dorchen Leidholdt>and very often inequality is shown in the form of sexual violence together. <v Dorchen Leidholdt>It sexualizes inequality, it sexualizes violence, and it has a <v Dorchen Leidholdt>powerful, powerful impact on people's perceptions <v Dorchen Leidholdt>of women as a result. <v Demonstraters>Halt! I was only thinking about sex. <v Demonstraters>You better not think about sex. You better not talk about it either. <v Demonstraters>The Meese Commission wants to censor you for thinking, speaking, knowing, reading, <v Demonstraters>looking at sex! <v Narrator>When the Commission on Pornography held hearings in New York City, pro porn <v Narrator>and anti-censorship groups demonstrated outside federal buildings. <v Demonstrater>I say to anybody who wants to uh keep on sending laws on <v Demonstrater>the statutes of this country is a psychopath, they have a serious problem in <v Demonstrater>trying to deal with the facts of life. <v Demonstrater>They are not well, and in my opinion, they don't represent the majority of the people in <v Demonstrater>this country.
<v Commission member>How do you know about the details of-? <v Narrator>In chambers, the commission heard testimony from Deep Throat star Linda Marciano, <v Narrator>once known as Linda Lovelace. <v Linda Marciano>I think it's very important for people to know that I was not a willing participant. <v Linda Marciano>There were guns, there were-there were knives, there was beatings. <v Linda Marciano>There was threats on the lives of my family constantly. <v Linda Marciano>You know, so many people that produce these types of films will say, well, we check <v Linda Marciano>out, make sure that these people are doing these women are doing it willingly. <v Linda Marciano>But I-you know, I always ask them, have-had Mr. Traynor come with Linda Lovelace <v Linda Marciano>10 years ago, would you have known that she was an unwilling participant? <v Gloria Leonard>I don't think that we-that we degrade women. <v Gloria Leonard>I think we glorify women, we exalt women. <v Gloria Leonard>We certainly don't exploit them. We do not to the contrary, drug <v Gloria Leonard>them and drag them in off the street. I mean, there are times when we have to practically <v Gloria Leonard>beat them off with a stick. I mean that just in you know, in the-in the literal sense, <v Gloria Leonard>we have women who send us in the mail, their own pictures, their own Polaroids <v Gloria Leonard>that their-their husbands have taken, submitting themselves as potential
<v Gloria Leonard>centerfold material. And many of them believe me already. <v Andrea Dworkin>Well, I agree that not everyone is coerced. <v Andrea Dworkin>I think that women are socialized to get all sense of self-worth <v Andrea Dworkin>and gratification from male sexual approval. <v Andrea Dworkin>And that, in fact, what's remarkable isn't <v Andrea Dworkin>that some women volunteer, but there's so many women have to be forced <v Andrea Dworkin>because pornography, in fact, represents what it is that we're supposed to <v Andrea Dworkin>want to become. <v Veronica Vera>I think that-that was how I counted my worth sometimes, you know, <v Veronica Vera>by how good I was sexually with men. <v Veronica Vera>So in a way, I'm still doing that. <v Veronica Vera>OK, that's me on my first communion day as a bride <v Veronica Vera>of Christ with my little sister in front of our church <v Veronica Vera>and I'm wearing a crown because my mother sold more raffle tickets <v Veronica Vera>than anybody else.
<v Veronica Vera>All of us with our crowns on, had our mothers hustling raffle tickets for the Catholic <v Veronica Vera>Church. <v Narrator>The pornography industry attracts performers from all segments of society. <v Narrator>It's a chance to be in show business. <v Narrator>But other factors influence decisions to become a porn star. <v Veronica Vera>It was also a way to <v Veronica Vera>take this little girl who didn't know anything about sex and who <v Veronica Vera>was feeling guilty about her feelings that she didn't understand. <v Veronica Vera>And in porn, I could-I could be-I <v Veronica Vera>could go to the furthest extreme, and yet I was still me, <v Veronica Vera>I still knew I was me. So in a way, I was justifying this little girl <v Veronica Vera>in the big-who didn't understand all these things, who and who got the feeling, <v Veronica Vera>you know, when I was just didn't understand what it was all about, that-that <v Veronica Vera>these sexual feelings were somehow turning me into a monster. <v Veronica Vera>And when I played them that through porn, it was like
<v Veronica Vera>proving that I wasn't a monster because I was still me. <v Veronica Vera>When I'm having sex in front of a camera, that's a potential audience of thousands, <v Veronica Vera>maybe millions, maybe from now until the film, whereas out on and on, you know, forever. <v Veronica Vera>I mean, that's great. <v Veronica Vera>That's I mean, that turns me into a goddess. <v Woman>OK. Take 237 to Calaveras Boulevard and you're going to take <v Woman>[overlapping conversations] <v Man>With the mind being the largest sex organ in the body, it allows an awful lot of fantasy <v Man>involved in visualization. <v Nina Hartley>We're here to work, bring those autographs! <v Bystander>That's some nice looking stuff. It's like the <v Bystander>great American dream, I guess, some nice looking stuff. <v Bystander>Probably Nina Hartley or Shanna McCullough wouldn't matter. <v Bystander>Both of them would be nice, but if I can only get one that'd be ok.
<v Bystander>[Indistinct small conversation] <v Manager>What I'd like to do, I'd actually like to form two lines. <v Manager>One line if you want to be videotaped with a star, you purchased a movie either today <v Manager>or before, the other line if you just want to walk up, get an autograph and take <v Manager>their picture and then go on. <v Bystander>It's mostly like for an outlet for fantasy. <v Bystander>It's like you see these women engaged in sexual acts with <v Bystander>multiple partners. Somehow you just get jealous and what it would be like if <v Bystander>you were to engage in such promiscuous activities. <v Bystander>I love these girls, love their work. <v Nina Hartley>He loves to hold us. <v Nina Hartley, Shanna McCullough, Bystander>Yeah, well it's people like Kent that make us do what we do. <v Nina Hartley, Shanna McCullough, Bystander>Us appreciative, friendly folks, you know, good old normal American <v Nina Hartley, Shanna McCullough, Bystander>male, like you said, he's the horniest guy. <v Nina Hartley, Shanna McCullough, Bystander>And you'll go, right? Go Gilroy! ?inaudible conversation? <v Nina Hartley, Shanna McCullough, Bystander>Yeah. I love garlic, man, not each day though. <v Manager>It's very hectic, as you can tell, but it looks like <v Manager>it's gonna be a great promotion. Fellows, if you want to take pictures, you have to stand
<v Manager>in-. <v Nina Hartley, Shanna McCullough, Bystander>[Indistinct conversation] Age doesn't mean anything. <v Bystander>No, just because there's a ?inaudible? <v Bystander>Something doesn't mean the fire's out. <v Bystanders>Pornography uh....[Other bystander says, "involves sex"] Yeah. <v Bystanders>Pornography? That's children's movies. [Bystanders laugh] Isn't this the children's section? I thought this <v Bystanders>was the Disney section. Yeah. <v Bystanders>Yeah, that's that's probably what it is, is probably a Disneyland for adults. <v Narrator>At this suburban video store. <v Narrator>The opportunity to meet and be photographed with porn stars has drawn hundreds <v Narrator>of customers. This store calls 35% of its profits <v Narrator>from X rated sales and rentals. <v Narrator>Adult industry spokespersons claim that in the United States alone, 400 <v Narrator>million adult videos were rented last year. <v Narrator>There are now more than 10,000 adult video titles in circulation. <v William Margold>We have the visual sex, we are the sex that likes the lights on. <v William Margold>We are the ones who insist on seeing the object of our excitement, <v William Margold>women less so. And when men can have free access
<v William Margold>to this material as we can in America, there's a market for it. <v William Margold>The male dominant factor in our industry is what the male dominated audience <v William Margold>needs to see because men are essentially insecure in their plays with women. <v William Margold>Men are in a position throughout their entire life, even Casanova <v William Margold>and Don Long at one time or another were said no to by somebody they wanted to go to bed <v William Margold>with. So once that happens, the male wants to do something to the <v William Margold>female but doesn't have the courage to do it. <v William Margold>So our films are that vivacious magic carpet ride to their sexual <v William Margold>satisfaction. I believe that our films are totally and nothing else but a catharsis. <v Narrator>Although the video cassette market is a goldmine for pornographers, soft and hard <v Narrator>core magazines continue to sell briskly. <v Narrator>Some of the more popular men's magazines have been successful in building a mass <v Narrator>audience. Their contents derive legitimacy from articles <v Narrator>by respected authors.
<v Narrator>Interviews with political figures, clever cartoons, <v Narrator>sophisticated ads along with the usual array of fantasy sex <v Narrator>objects. Their stature is enhanced by centerfolds and pictorials, which <v Narrator>feature the provocatively posed girl next door. <v Narrator>College women, professional women all presented with a respectability <v Narrator>conferred by upscale packaging. <v Narrator>Advertising has appropriated themes and images once found only in pornography. <v Narrator>A barrage of its messages are targeted to women, in particular, reminding <v Narrator>them that sexual desirability is central to success and happiness. <v Actress>Would it be asking too much for you to come over? You know, without your shirt <v Actress>and buff my bumpers? <v Narrator>Network television shows, sitcoms, and soap operas exploit the sex <v Narrator>charged atmosphere. Scenarios which formerly would have been denied an R rating
<v Narrator>are common fare. Titillating shows attract huge audiences, <v Narrator>higher ratings and ultimately greater advertising revenues. <v Narrator>As pornography established a legitimate presence in popular culture, Hollywood <v Narrator>has responded to the competition for an audience with frankly sexual themes. <v Narrator>Many films have challenged the boundaries of the existing rating system. <v Narrator>R-rated films have become increasingly more provocative and explicit. <v Jack Valenti>The rating system does not use the word pornography, it does <v Jack Valenti>not use the word obscenity for these are legal terms. <v Jack Valenti>And we do not pretend to be lawyers. <v Jack Valenti>We do not pretend to be shepherds of the Constitution. <v Jack Valenti>All we're doing is giving information to parents. <v Jack Valenti>I think it's fair to say that we do not allow
<v Jack Valenti>the kind of explicit sex that you associate with what you even call <v Jack Valenti>soft porn and certainly not hardcore porn. <v Jack Valenti>Not in a legal definition, but in the street definition of it that's not appearing <v Jack Valenti>in any R movies. We try to draw the line on violence, particularly <v Jack Valenti>when it slips over to this murky underworld of sadomasochism <v Jack Valenti>or all the other hyphenated aberrations. <v Actress>I want to hold you. <v Narrator>In 1990, the ratings board introduced a new category, NC-17, <v Narrator>no children under 17 admitted. <v Narrator>For filmmakers, the new rating allows for greater distribution opportunities and <v Narrator>increased freedom to explore themes which formerly guaranteed an X rating. <v Jack Valenti>The ratings change as a society changes. <v Jack Valenti>People ask me, why don't you make movies like you used to?
<v Jack Valenti>My answer, a plaintive one is why isn't the society the way <v Jack Valenti>it used to be? [Music video briefly plays]. <v Narrator>In 1981, Music Television, or MTV first appeared <v Narrator>nationally on cable. <v Narrator>Targeted to teenage record consumers. <v Narrator>Music videos combine sophisticated advertising techniques with popular music <v Narrator>to sell their products to an eager audience. <v Narrator>Many of the videos are fun and innovative, but as the profits of MTV <v Narrator>and the record industry have grown, so has concern about some of the values <v Narrator>that MTV transmits to youth. <v Sut Jhally>Our understandings of the world, the assumptions that guide our behavior in the world <v Sut Jhally>are not simply created in our heads, our understanding of reality <v Sut Jhally>is a social process. <v Sut Jhally>The images that surround us are a part of that process. <v Sut Jhally>If we accept that the dream world of rock video is an important part,
<v Sut Jhally>certainly not the only one of the process whereby young people construct <v Sut Jhally>understandings of the world. <v Sut Jhally>What might some of its possible effects be? <v Narrator>In his homemade videotape using MTV samples, university professor <v Narrator>Sut Jhally was critical of how women are portrayed in some music videos. <v Narrator>When MTV learned of this videotapes distribution, it threatened suit, <v Narrator>accusing Professor Jhally of infringing its copyrights and trademarks. <v Narrator>Issues of artistic expression collided with obscenity statutes in recent <v Narrator>cases involving two photographers in Cincinnati. <v Narrator>Controversy over photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe ignited a national debate <v Narrator>about government support of the arts, censorship and artistic freedom. <v Narrator>And in San Francisco, Jock Sturges attracted notice of local police <v Narrator>and FBI.
<v Jock Sturges>I opened the door to a porch full of law enforcement types with guns and badges, <v Jock Sturges>no smiles and very aggressive questioning. <v Jock Sturges>And I was thunderstruck. I mean, I was just I couldn't believe it. <v Jock Sturges>It was like having a nightmare happening and knowing that you weren't going to wake up <v Jock Sturges>from it because these people were really there. <v Narrator>Sturges is known for his candid photographs of nude girls and their families, <v Narrator>mostly photographed in naturist colonies in southern France. <v Narrator>Acting on state and federal guidelines provided by law enforcement officials about <v Narrator>child pornography an employee of Newell color labs in San Francisco <v Narrator>called the FBI regarding negatives ultimately traced to Jack Sturges, <v Narrator>an examination of the images in question brought law enforcement personnel to Sturges' <v Narrator>home. Within hours, an exhaustive search of the premises was underway. <v Jock Sturges>The negatives were made from colored transparencies that were spontaneous <v Jock Sturges>photographs taken of people on beaches. <v Jock Sturges>There were nudes, there were fathers and daughters.
<v Jock Sturges>They were pictures of people taken in the natural course of their lives and <v Jock Sturges>were no more salacious than any other work that I do. <v Narrator>But according to an FBI declaration, the contact sheet provided by Newell <v Narrator>color lab contained different subject matter. <v Narrator>Approximately 51 photographs were depicted on the contact sheets, 34 <v Narrator>of the photographs depicted, obviously prepubescent nude girls. <v Narrator>29 of those photographs showed the young girls with their genitals exposed. <v Jock Sturges>This is-it had a lot of effects in my life, not the least of which is it's made me far <v Jock Sturges>more apt to censor myself in the course of working and I'm frankly not comfortable with <v Jock Sturges>that. Were artists to limit themselves to never create any <v Jock Sturges>depiction that might conceivably be considered stimulating <v Jock Sturges>to some individual there would be no art made at all. <v Jock Sturges>My art is not intentionally sexually stimulating. <v Jock Sturges>I am sure that some of it might be on occasion, but that is not its majority intent <v Jock Sturges>or even a conscious intent in its creation.
<v Narrator>A federal grand jury declined to indict Jock Sturges on child pornography <v Narrator>charges. <v Narrator>The battle for control of the cultural environment has reached political dimensions, <v Narrator>and the battleground is the First Amendment. <v Singer>[Lyrics from 2 Live Crew's album's 2 Live Is What We Are]. <v Ralph Ginzburg>You're dealing with something which is so highly subjective that it doesn't lend itself, <v Ralph Ginzburg>A, to scientific and B, certainly not to legal definition. <v Ralph Ginzburg>It cannot be done. And beside that, much more important than that, the Constitution <v Ralph Ginzburg>doesn't permit that kind of discrimination or fine point <v Ralph Ginzburg>or nit picking. It says Congress shall make no law abridging freedom <v Ralph Ginzburg>of speech or press, period. <v Frederick Schauer>I think it's clear that although the First Amendment says <v Frederick Schauer>Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech or of the press,
<v Frederick Schauer>that cannot plausibly, by any conceivable stretch of the imagination, <v Frederick Schauer>include every possible writing or every possible <v Frederick Schauer>form of speech. We talk all the time, we commit fraud by speech, we perjure <v Frederick Schauer>ourselves by speech, we make contracts by speech. <v Frederick Schauer>It's inevitable that what the First Amendment protects is something less <v Frederick Schauer>than the sum total of every possible written or spoken act. <v Barry Lynn>Well, according to the Supreme Court, obscenity has no First Amendment protection. <v Barry Lynn>And I think that's the fundamental flaw with what the Supreme Court has done. <v Barry Lynn>It has already sanctioned a broad kind of censorship of sexually oriented <v Barry Lynn>materials in our country. <v Barry Lynn>The Supreme Court said pornography contains no ideas therefore, it's not protected <v Barry Lynn>by the First Amendment. I find that argument simply in-incorrect. <v Barry Lynn>Of course, there are ideas in pornography. <v Barry Lynn>Pornography preaches a message that it's good to have sex with
<v Barry Lynn>lots of people in lots of positions in lots of places. <v Barry Lynn>Now, many of us have great moral and aesthetic objections to that idea. <v Barry Lynn>But certainly pornography ought to have a right in our country to make <v Barry Lynn>that point and to make it very graphically. <v Brad Curl>The First Amendment was given to us by our founding fathers as a means that the public <v Brad Curl>could have the little guy could have to hold those who abused power accountable. <v Brad Curl>And so we have a right and a duty to speak out, to organize, to rally, <v Brad Curl>to have public assemblies. That's one of our constitutional rights to say, hey, you guys <v Brad Curl>are making too much money, distributing too much filth in our neighborhoods and we don't <v Brad Curl>like it, and that's the reason the First Amendment was given, and <v Brad Curl>there's no censorship. That's not prior restraint that's coming after an issue once <v Brad Curl>the crime has been committed if we can prove it. <v Demonstrater>I think the committee has a right to-we believe that under the constitution, we have a <v Demonstrater>right to establish community standards and that depends on the citizenry
<v Demonstrater>and we're part of the citizenry. We think we have a right to express our views as well. <v Narrator>Although the sale of most pornography is legal, community standards have been invoked <v Narrator>in efforts to reconcile conflicts about its display and accessibility. <v Narrator>Zoning laws and ordinances have done little to stem the flow of pornography <v Narrator>into every corner of American life. <v Narrator>In a small town, a local citizen action group protests its sale at a neighborhood <v Narrator>convenience store. <v Protester>Obscenity is a crime, and it is not protected by the First Amendment any more <v Protester>than libel and slander or yelling fire in <v Protester>a crowded theater. <v Protester>It is definitely not protected by the First Amendment. <v Protester>It is not a question of freedom of speech. <v Protester>It is a crime. The Supreme Court has said so. <v Bystander>You know, the body is the body. <v Bystander>God made it. And if, you know, these people are ashamed of it then that's their problem, <v Bystander>that's their fault. I just think it's ridiculous, they're wasting their time.
<v Protester>I don't certainly have a right to do whatever they want in their own homes, their own <v Protester>communities, that's true. But the problem has been that so much of this material <v Protester>has gotten out into the hands of young people that children, small children as <v Protester>well as teenagers. <v Bystander>I mean, some of this stuff that these signs are saying, not even. <v Bystander>These books and stuff don't have anything to do with that. <v Bystander>Child abuse and stuff that's a sickness. <v Protester>Pornography has a tremendously bad effect on us, that leads us <v Protester>to degeneration of a human being and uh particularly <v Protester>females, I think, and children. <v Protester>And it's leading our society into deviations because it never stops <v Protester>with sex. It always goes deeper and it leads him into <v Protester>eventually the bottom line is-is Satanism. <v Barry Lynn>Boycotts are certainly protected forms of expression <v Barry Lynn>in the United States. But I think it does a great disservice to the idea of free
<v Barry Lynn>expression for organized groups to apply pressure, <v Barry Lynn>which leads to the diminution of the availability <v Barry Lynn>of a wide range of material, including material about human sexuality. <v Barry Lynn>So although it's not a violation of the Constitution for people <v Barry Lynn>to boycott, I think people should consider whether in fact it <v Barry Lynn>is consistent with the general impression of free expression in our <v Barry Lynn>country. <v Frederick Schauer>Citizen boycotts have been talked about as a way <v Frederick Schauer>of dealing with the problem of pornography. <v Frederick Schauer>People have argued that it is censorship, that it's prior restraint or something of that <v Frederick Schauer>sort. But those are words. <v Frederick Schauer>And by just using those general terms like censorship, we fail <v Frederick Schauer>to capture the way in which restriction by government is fundamentally <v Frederick Schauer>different from private people exercising the kinds of choices that they are <v Frederick Schauer>constitutionally entitled to exercise and personally obliged to exercise.
<v Frederick Schauer>The Supreme Court made that very clear a few years ago when it protected <v Frederick Schauer>under the First Amendment the NAACP right to engage in a boycott. <v Brad Curl>Well, I think we have to enter into this arena of public <v Brad Curl>opinion. We have to go out there and fight for our views. <v Brad Curl>That's what the-that's what freedom is all about and uh there are many small groups who <v Brad Curl>made big noises through public demonstrations. <v Brad Curl>And we have said sat back and said, well, I'm not going to embarrass myself. <v Brad Curl>I'm not gonna picket. It's kind of humbling to-to submit yourself to the <v Brad Curl>public fire of those who disagree with you. <v Brad Curl>But it's part of the price of freedom and it's part of the price of maintaining our <v Brad Curl>dignity as a people. <v Narrator>One organization that has been in the forefront of the controversy about pornography <v Narrator>is the American Civil Liberties Union. <v Narrator>It has been the leading proponent of the adult entertainment industry, raising charges <v Narrator>of complicity from foes.
<v Barry Lynn>The ACLU certainly has been criticized because it seems to be on the side of <v Barry Lynn>pornographers. In fact, it's on the side of the First Amendment, which in some cases <v Barry Lynn>happens to protect the work of pornographers. <v Barry Lynn>We defend people, whether they're powerful or powerless, whether they have lots of money <v Barry Lynn>or no money. If we think that they have a right to speak and we do think <v Barry Lynn>the pornographers have a right to speak. <v Evalina Kane>Well the groups that are protecting them, and primarily it has been the ACLU <v Evalina Kane>have a clear vested interest in protecting them and that's economic um, <v Evalina Kane>and I think that really needs to be said. <v Evalina Kane>Many-very prosperous ACLU attorneys do, <v Evalina Kane>in fact, represent pornographers. <v Andrea Dworkin>Playboy has been very effective in spreading its money around in a way to get <v Andrea Dworkin>great political influence, not just with the American Civil Liberties Union, but even <v Andrea Dworkin>inside the feminist movement. <v Andrea Dworkin>They've given money to all kinds of reproductive rights projects that <v Andrea Dworkin>have made feminists feel very, very beholden to them.
<v Twiss Butler>Well, by becoming the gatekeeper to women's reproductive rights, the ACLU <v Twiss Butler>also has become the gatekeeper to women's right, to a legal <v Twiss Butler>remedy against pornography. <v Twiss Butler>The harder they defend women's right to an abortion on <v Twiss Butler>the basis of privacy, the more they are defending <v Twiss Butler>that right of privacy and under it, anything that they choose to call sex, however <v Twiss Butler>harmful it may be to women. <v Andrea Dworkin>The American Civil Liberties Union doesn't just have a financial <v Andrea Dworkin>relationship with Playboy. <v Andrea Dworkin>It has a relationship with local pornographers in municipalities <v Andrea Dworkin>all over the country. <v Andrea Dworkin>And as a result, the ACLU is essentially bought by the pornographers. <v Andrea Dworkin>They do their business for them. <v Andrea Dworkin>And, you know, of all the people in the country who need help in defending <v Andrea Dworkin>their speech rights, the pornographers are the only ones who can actually afford <v Andrea Dworkin>to pay their lawyers.
<v Barry Lynn>There's no question that the ACLU, which pre-dated the bunny empire by <v Barry Lynn>about 30 years, was not, is not, and never will be bought <v Barry Lynn>off by a couple of coins from the Hefner family or from anybody else. <v Barry Lynn>And I think it's a cheap shot that's made to frankly, distort this <v Barry Lynn>debate so that we don't get down to the question of what is right about free <v Barry Lynn>expression in our country. This is just a diversion and it's an unfortunate <v Barry Lynn>and unpleasant one. <v Narrator>Sexually explicit materials exist for every appetite and sexual proclivity. <v Narrator>Gay pornography is big business, with thousands of videotape and magazine titles <v Narrator>in circulation. For gay consumers pornography serves complex <v Narrator>social functions. <v Nan Hunter>If you want to just kind of think about gay male pornography and <v Nan Hunter>the content of those images, I think that for many people those <v Nan Hunter>images are very shocking, they're very unusual, they're very upsetting
<v Nan Hunter>to people in the heterosexual majority. <v Nan Hunter>I think that-that you first look at those images and they seem very unsettling <v Nan Hunter>in a kind of way, but I don't think that that's sufficient grounds to ban <v Nan Hunter>those images, and I don't think those images do any harm. <v Nan Hunter>And I think, in fact, when if you-if you think about it within the terms of a <v Nan Hunter>homosexual male subculture, those images can be <v Nan Hunter>affirming for a gay man, for example, in a small town <v Nan Hunter>in the United States. The only indication that he might <v Nan Hunter>have or the first indication he might have as he grows up, that there exists <v Nan Hunter>sort of other gay men in other-in other places, may-may be <v Nan Hunter>these kinds of images. <v Demonstraters>The First Amendment is here to stay! Meese commission go away! <v Edwin Meese III>Current federal laws are being violated. <v Edwin Meese III>And thus, I am committed to redoubling the federal effort to ensure that those criminal <v Edwin Meese III>elements who are trafficking in obscenity are pursued with a vengeance
<v Edwin Meese III>and prosecuted to the hilt. <v Carole Vance>If we look back over the past hundred years of European and American history, we see <v Carole Vance>that cyclically there appears something that historians have come to call sex panics or <v Carole Vance>moral panic. Usually a sex panic alleges that one particular <v Carole Vance>kind of sexual behavior or another is a profound threat to the family, to women, <v Carole Vance>often to children, very vulnerable groups and extremely serious <v Carole Vance>and repressive government measures are called for in order to protect these groups. <v Carole Vance>Now, the interesting thing about sex panics is that they always utilize <v Carole Vance>material and themes and images that have to do with sexual pollution. <v Carole Vance>That is, they point the finger at groups on the lower rungs of the sexual <v Carole Vance>hierarchy and they sort of drag them out into the full light of day in a very despised <v Carole Vance>way. <v William Roberts>Part of an S&M film when they start torturing the victim <v William Roberts>and tying them and whipping them and putting cigarets out on their body <v William Roberts>is the showing of pain.
<v William Roberts>This is what sexually excite some people. <v Narrator>Perhaps the most controversial genre of pornography is that group of representations <v Narrator>known as Sadomasochistic. <v Narrator>Complex in its implications, S&M imagery was once found only <v Narrator>under limited circumstances. <v Narrator>Today it is openly available in adult bookstores and video cassette tape <v Narrator>outlets. <v Carole Vance>In thinking about this, we have to first begin by realizing that S&M is a sexual <v Carole Vance>minority, it's a subculture that's very poorly understood. <v Carole Vance>The fantasy of dominating someone is very unconnected <v Carole Vance>with the actuality of dominating someone. <v Carole Vance>So it's a fantasy of domination that hinges on everyone agreeing to do it through mutual <v Carole Vance>consent, and I think people who aren't familiar with this when they see S&M pornography <v Carole Vance>read it as literally true, read it as literal aggression or violence or the wish <v Carole Vance>to overpower someone. And I think that is in fact, very different from this kind of <v Carole Vance>pro-rape porn. <v Loretta Haroian>Sex and violence will always be linked together because testosterone is the <v Loretta Haroian>hormone of sex and violence.
<v Loretta Haroian>And the sexual area of the brain and the violent area of the brain <v Loretta Haroian>are adjacent to each other, and so they will always be linked <v Loretta Haroian>in some sort or another. In a civilized society where we have lots of controls <v Loretta Haroian>on violence we tend to ritualized violence. <v Loretta Haroian>And that's why you see the more civilized society becomes, the more prevalence <v Loretta Haroian>there is of S&M in the sexual behavior. <v Narrator>The symbols of S&M pornography have found their way into mainstream entertainment <v Narrator>media, photo and fashion magazines have easily integrated these images <v Narrator>into their pages. Millions of readers are no longer surprised by this <v Narrator>imagery. And while the extremity of the messages is toned down, even <v Narrator>the most popular women's magazines incorporate messages which reveal <v Narrator>that for women, the areas of self-esteem and sexuality remain complexly <v Narrator>determined.
<v Andrea Dworkin>Women's magazines have a particular social function of making sure that women <v Andrea Dworkin>don't get out of line and accept all the basic dogma of femininity <v Andrea Dworkin>and conform to it. <v Andrea Dworkin>And certainly magazines like Cosmopolitan are involved in making certain <v Andrea Dworkin>that women conform to the dominant sexual ethos of our time. <v Andrea Dworkin>And women are going to find their sense of identification and pleasure <v Andrea Dworkin>and self-worth in essentially being consumed as a sex <v Andrea Dworkin>object by men. <v Gloria Leonard>I think most women harbor a certain fantasy to dress up in a garter belt and high <v Gloria Leonard>heels and maybe not necessarily be in an X-rated film, but perhaps <v Gloria Leonard>be a centerfold. The boudoir photography business, for example, is booming <v Gloria Leonard>where Jane average pays somebody to dress her up in <v Gloria Leonard>some frilly lingerie in soft focus lighting either <v Gloria Leonard>nude or not nude, depending on what she feels most comfortable with. <v Gloria Leonard>I mean, that's a thriving business now and they present these photographs to their-to
<v Gloria Leonard>their lovers or their husbands and perhaps even to their families I don't know what's <v Gloria Leonard>going on out there. <v Photographer>What did you have in mind on this shot? <v Photographer>What did you see in your-in your mind of yourself? <v Man>Well, you know, the um the soloflex ad. <v Man>I was a little concerned about taking off my clothes in front of him at first, but when <v Man>it actually came time to doing it, it wasn't that big of a deal. <v Man>Once you settle in, you become very comfortable. <v Man>He was a professional. He makes a point of making you feel at ease, and <v Man>after a while, it's no different than being in a locker room. <v Photographer>Men read sexually explict materials at home, and women realize <v Photographer>that men appreciate those so often they want to document <v Photographer>themselves to have something personal to give to their loved one. <v Man>This particular picture and these pictures were done for a certain person, and with that <v Man>in mind and in a way, it was like a love letter, if you <v Man>will, a photographic love letter to her.
<v Man>And I'm not sure that I would be comfortable having my love letters <v Man>splattered all over for public consumption, if you will. <v Man>It's not a matter of being prudish. It's a matter of, this was a communication between <v Man>her and I. <v Morgan Cowin>There is a relationship, I suppose, between boudoir photography and commercial <v Morgan Cowin>pornography in that it can be used to arouse. <v Morgan Cowin>Pornography is generally a uh maybe the same subject <v Morgan Cowin>matter and may even be the same kinds of poses maybe, <v Morgan Cowin>but it's for a wider audience, for an unknown anonymous audience. <v Morgan Cowin>Whereas the boudoir photography is for a single person generally. <v Narrator>The newest genre of adult entertainment is amateur video. <v Narrator>Partners turn camcorders on themselves and become the stars of their own sexual <v Narrator>interludes. The videos enhance their sex lives. <v Narrator>Through special interest magazines, couples can exchange videos with others in <v Narrator>an informal network, and the mainstream consumer of X-rated materials
<v Narrator>has discovered their products. <v Laird Sutton>There is a level of intimacy and honesty and reality in that, that <v Laird Sutton>I believe people really, really want. <v Laird Sutton>And I think that that's one of the big reasons that amateur video <v Laird Sutton>is so important and such a large growing segment of the <v Laird Sutton>media today. <v Bystander> You tell me why America's so obessed with sex. <v Bystander>Pornography is gonna become more violent, more-more subjugating of women <v Bystander>because um the country is less and less permissive and <v Bystander>so there's more of a need for that outlet I guess. <v Bystander>Yes, it's here to stay. It's big business. <v Bystander>It's big business worldwide, whether in America or in Europe or even in Asia, of course, <v Bystander>of a ?sort? as well. So, of course, it's going to be here and it's going to get bigger.
Please note: This content is only available at GBH and the Library of Congress, either due to copyright restrictions or because this content has not yet been reviewed for copyright or privacy issues. For information about on location research, click here.
Program
Patently Offensive: Porn Under Siege
Producing Organization
KQED-TV (Television station : San Francisco, Calif.)
Contributing Organization
KQED (San Francisco, California)
The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia (Athens, Georgia)
AAPB ID
cpb-aacip-55-z60bv7bg5b
If you have more information about this item than what is given here, or if you have concerns about this record, we want to know! Contact us, indicating the AAPB ID (cpb-aacip-55-z60bv7bg5b).
Description
Program Description
"Even in the caves, sex was graphically depicted. Eight years in the making, PATENTLY OFFENSIVE begins with a glimpse at erotic art history and explores the social, cultural and technological roots of today's Porn Wars. Pornography's influence on all other media and the range of attitudes which exist about its relationships to the First Amendment and shifting values provide surprising insights into contemporary American life. Confronting the compelling controversies from diverse perspectives, Patently Offensive reveals the local, regional and national face of the pornographic challenge; exposing the irreconcilable tension between private conduct and public policy."--1991 Peabody Awards entry form.
Description
New technologies have catapulted pornography into a $10 billion industry despite sustained attacks from feminist and groupd traditionally concerned about the moral environment, porn profits soar. This film examines pornography in its social and historical context, and the debate about pornography that touches many of today's issues: individual rights, censorship, feminist theory, artistic freedom and family values.
Broadcast Date
1991-11-22
Asset type
Program
Media type
Moving Image
Duration
00:58:49.087
Credits
Producing Organization: KQED-TV (Television station : San Francisco, Calif.)
AAPB Contributor Holdings
KQED
Identifier: cpb-aacip-c1b413985d1 (Filename)
Format: 1 inch videotape
Generation: Master
Duration: 1:00:00
The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia
Identifier: cpb-aacip-af78fe6fd8f (Filename)
Format: U-matic
Duration: 00:58:00
KQED
Identifier: cpb-aacip-8f8950cd07f (unknown)
Format: application/mxf
Duration: 1:00:00
If you have a copy of this asset and would like us to add it to our catalog, please contact us.
Citations
Chicago: “Patently Offensive: Porn Under Siege,” 1991-11-22, KQED, The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC, accessed May 5, 2025, http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-55-z60bv7bg5b.
MLA: “Patently Offensive: Porn Under Siege.” 1991-11-22. KQED, The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Web. May 5, 2025. <http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-55-z60bv7bg5b>.
APA: Patently Offensive: Porn Under Siege. Boston, MA: KQED, The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-55-z60bv7bg5b