thumbnail of Chicago Tonight; No. 8171; Juvenile Court
Transcript
Hide -
<v James Jordan>The kids have uh become more mobile because of stealing <v James Jordan>cars and getting around the city. <v James Jordan>They think nothing of stealing cars. <v James Jordan>They steal them right in front of this building. [music] <v John Callaway>Good evening, I'm John Callaway and welcome to Chicago tonight. <v John Callaway>There is no doubt that the Department of Children and Family Services and our juvenile <v John Callaway>court system are abysmal failures. <v John Callaway>There are reports that almost as many children are harmed as are benefited by coming <v John Callaway>under their common egis. Those were the words of an elder to an Illinois appellate <v John Callaway>court judgment in the recent high visibility case involving a little girl who <v John Callaway>came through Bob Greene's columns in the Tribune to be known as Sarah. <v John Callaway>What happened to Sarah was and is symptomatic of a juvenile justice system that has <v John Callaway>fallen into severe disrepute and apparent dysfunction.
<v John Callaway>Our program tonight is part of WTTW's Chicago Matters Partnership with <v John Callaway>the Chicago Community Trust, which this year is focusing attention on issues critical <v John Callaway>to the lives of children. This evening on Chicago Tonight, we'll see one of the most <v John Callaway>vocal critics of the juvenile justice system, Patrick Murphy, the Cook County Public <v John Callaway>Guardian in debate and discussion with the presiding judge of the juvenile division of <v John Callaway>the Cook County Circuit Court, Arthur M. Hamilton and with the administrative director <v John Callaway>of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Jeffrey M. <v John Callaway>Arnold. We will begin that debate and discussion after this background report from <v John Callaway>Chicago Tonight correspondent Chita Ragavan, who reminds us that once upon a time, the <v John Callaway>juvenile court of Cook County was something quite special. <v Chitra Ragavan>The Cook County Juvenile Court was the first juvenile court in the world. <v Chitra Ragavan>It was established in 1899, thanks to the efforts of renowned social worker <v Chitra Ragavan>Jane Addams and her colleagues Lucy Flowers, Julia Lathrop and others. <v Chitra Ragavan>Adams had founded Hull House in 1889 as a social experiment.
<v Chitra Ragavan>Now, a part of the campus of the University of Illinois at Chicago, Hull House is located <v Chitra Ragavan>in what was then one of the most crowded and poor neighborhoods in the country and <v Chitra Ragavan>the main entry point for new immigrants to the city. <v Chitra Ragavan>The women of Hull House lobbied hard for a juvenile court after they saw the problems <v Chitra Ragavan>faced by delinquent children in their community, problems described by Julia Lathrop <v Chitra Ragavan>and portrayed in this recent WTTW documentary on Jane Addams. <v Actress for Jane Addams>[Documentary excerpt] Children over 10 years of age were arrested, held in the police <v Actress for Jane Addams>stations, tried in the police courts. <v Actress for Jane Addams>If convicted, they were usually fined. <v Actress for Jane Addams>And if the fine was not paid, they were sent to the city prison. <v Chitra Ragavan>The current director of the Health House Museum, Mary Ann Johnson, says Jane Addams and <v Chitra Ragavan>her colleagues recognized it was damaging for these children to be treated like adults <v Chitra Ragavan>and put in jail with adult offenders. <v Mary Ann Johnson>There was a tendency, as they felt, to rob children of their childhood <v Mary Ann Johnson>to treat them as adult offenders and not to treat them as special
<v Mary Ann Johnson>with special needs in terms of supervision and protection. <v Chitra Ragavan>Jane Addams idea of a separate court for children today has evolved into the second <v Chitra Ragavan>largest juvenile court system in the country, next only to Los Angeles. <v Chitra Ragavan>Its history is mostly forgotten, buried under the weight of criticism that the Cook <v Chitra Ragavan>County juvenile court system is overcrowded, overburdened, mismanaged <v Chitra Ragavan>and in desperate need for reform. <v Elaine Thigpen>I would describe it as being very chaotic. <v Elaine Thigpen>Judges and attorneys needing more education on child development to make <v Elaine Thigpen>better decisions about these children and what's in the best interest of the children. <v Elaine Thigpen>Needing public defenders to be more passionate about these parents and to serve them <v Elaine Thigpen>to do a better job doing that. <v Chitra Ragavan>The Cook County Juvenile Court handles abuse and neglect cases known as dependency cases <v Chitra Ragavan>from the Department of Children and Family Services or DCFS and criminal <v Chitra Ragavan>or delinquency cases from the Chicago and Suburban Police Departments. <v Chitra Ragavan>According to the Citizens Committee, an advisory group on the juvenile courts, last
<v Chitra Ragavan>year the court handled 24,289 cases compared <v Chitra Ragavan>to 15,905 in 1980. <v Chitra Ragavan>The most dramatic change in the last decade has been the increase in the numbers of abuse <v Chitra Ragavan>and neglect cases. In 1990, there were 6,246 <v Chitra Ragavan>cases compared to 1,950 in 1980. <v Chitra Ragavan>But although the number of cases have skyrocketed, the money from Cook County given to <v Chitra Ragavan>the juvenile courts has lagged behind. <v Chitra Ragavan>According to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, between 1975 <v Chitra Ragavan>and 1978, the number of juvenile court petitions increased 28 <v Chitra Ragavan>percent. But Cook County spending on the court declined 12 percent during <v Chitra Ragavan>that period. Between the overcrowding and the underfunding, it is the poor children <v Chitra Ragavan>who fall through the cracks, says case worker Elaine Thigpen. <v Elaine Thigpen>What usually what happens is the person who is rich usually get <v Elaine Thigpen>better services because they can go out and afford ya know an attorney. <v Elaine Thigpen>And then it seems that in this court, the judges prefer, I shouldn't say prefer,
<v Elaine Thigpen>but they give preference to the private attorneys rather than the public defenders and <v Elaine Thigpen>the states attorneys. And usually they end up getting out <v Elaine Thigpen>of the system much faster. <v Chitra Ragavan>Experts say not only are more kids committing crimes today but more children are arrested <v Chitra Ragavan>for serious crimes than in the past. <v Chitra Ragavan>James Jordan is the superintendent of the Cook County Temporary Juvenile Detention <v Chitra Ragavan>Center, better known as Howdy Home. <v Chitra Ragavan>It's the temporary holding cell for juvenile delinquents. <v Chitra Ragavan>Jordan has worked there more than 45 five years and says today's children are <v Chitra Ragavan>harder, tougher and more mobile than those of the past. <v James Jordan>They think nothing of stealing cars. <v James Jordan>They steal them right in front of this building. <v James Jordan>We've had three or four cars stolen right around this area. <v James Jordan>You parked down the street, didn't you? I hope you'll be safe. <v Chitra Ragavan>James Jordan says over the weekend alone, 95 children were arrested and placed <v Chitra Ragavan>in the temporary detention center, which, like the juvenile court system, is facing <v Chitra Ragavan>serious overcrowding and needs immediate attention.
<v James Jordan>Our staff is stretched as far <v James Jordan>as they can go. <v James Jordan>We have to work people overtime. <v James Jordan>And when we work them overtime, we have to pay them time and <v James Jordan>a half. It's an expensive proposition. <v James Jordan>It'll cost the county a lot of money. <v Chitra Ragavan>This could be an expensive year for Cook County because according to the Office of the <v Chitra Ragavan>Chief Probation Officer of Juvenile Court, in March alone, at least 750 <v Chitra Ragavan>children were arrested and brought to the juvenile court. <v Chitra Ragavan>For Chicago Tonight, I'm Chitra Ragavan. <v John Callaway>Now joining us to discuss the problems and the possibilities of the juvenile court system <v John Callaway>and Cook County are Arthur M. Hamilton, who is the presiding judge of the juvenile <v John Callaway>division of the Circuit Court of Cook County, a position that he has held for the past 10 <v John Callaway>years. Patrick Murphy, public guardian of Cook County, a position that he's held for <v John Callaway>the past 13 years. And Jeffrey Arnold, administrative director of the Cook County <v John Callaway>Circuit Court. And that's a position he's held for the past 12 years.
<v John Callaway>So we've got a lot of experience at the table this evening, and I hope we can have a good <v John Callaway>discussion about these issues. <v John Callaway>Mr. Murphy, on this program last week, we discussed the case. <v John Callaway>I think a lot of people in Chicago have read Bob Greene's columns about Sarah in the news <v John Callaway>coverage, the longtime practice of sending dependent or abused children back to their <v John Callaway>biological parents, even if, as in the case of Sarah, <v John Callaway>there had been a real deep bonding with foster parents. <v John Callaway>You were invited on that program last week, could not be with us because of the illness <v John Callaway>in your family. And I just wondered if you could begin by giving us an overview of <v John Callaway>the Sarah case and the appellate court ruling on it. <v Patrick Murphy>Well, we we represented Sarah and we were the only office we took that took the position <v Patrick Murphy>that Sarah should stay with her foster parents and not be returned to the <v Patrick Murphy>natural parents. After Bob Greene wrote his articles and DCFS flipped and the state's <v Patrick Murphy>attorney flipped and came over at our side. We're glad they did. <v Patrick Murphy>Sarah lived for six years with these um uh foster parents, <v Patrick Murphy>bonded to them. They did everything. They took her to school, potty trained her, et
<v Patrick Murphy>cetera. And then the natural parents showed up and said, we've reformed. <v Patrick Murphy>He was a pimp. She was a prostitute. They were both into drugs. <v Patrick Murphy>And the court gave the kid back. <v John Callaway>Gave them back to those people who said they were reformed. <v Patrick Murphy>Reformed and. <v John Callaway>After this bonding process occured? <v Patrick Murphy>Indeed, indeed, they may have reformed, but they did four or five years later. <v Patrick Murphy>And under federal law, under state law, there should have been reviews every six months <v Patrick Murphy>and certainly every 18 months to determine what was happening. <v John Callaway>And why weren't there those reviews? <v Patrick Murphy>Well, because both the court and especially DCFS in <v Patrick Murphy>the past decade or so simply hasn't been following the law. <v John Callaway>Why haven't they been following the law? They get up in the morning and say, let's abuse <v John Callaway>the law? <v Patrick Murphy>Well, I think what happened is, is you know when you said there's 6,000 neglect cases <v Patrick Murphy>last year, those are the number filed. There's 25 tho- there is 24,000- almost 24,000 <v Patrick Murphy>abuse and neglect cases in juvenile court. <v Patrick Murphy>And that's because if I bring Patrick Murphy to court on a neglect case, <v Patrick Murphy>he stays in the system until he's 18 or 21 and someone else comes <v Patrick Murphy>in behind him. So there's all kinds of kids there. <v Patrick Murphy>What happened is that the number of judges in the system increased slightly
<v Patrick Murphy>while the number of cases ballooned and there weren't enough judges to really look at <v Patrick Murphy>what was going on with the kids in the system. <v John Callaway>Is the Sarah case uh an aberration or is it representative <v John Callaway>of something that we really a larger problem? <v Patrick Murphy>It's representative of a larger problem is also representative of a mindset that that <v Patrick Murphy>has happened in the last 20 years in this country, and that is that biological <v Patrick Murphy>parents' right should be considered no matter what they've done to the kids. <v Patrick Murphy>I've seen biol- a mother, for instance, who broke 13 bones in her infant's <v Patrick Murphy>body, scalded the kid over two thirds of the body. Did two years in the joint come out <v Patrick Murphy>and say she's reform and got the kid back from loving foster parents who had raised this <v Patrick Murphy>kid for four years. And then when the mother after she got the kid back, by the way, the <v Patrick Murphy>foster mother died of a heart attack, probably no doubt of a broken heart. <v Patrick Murphy>And then when the natural parents said that they were ordered to counseling <v Patrick Murphy>by the judge and when they said it was too hard to go, DCFS has hired a van and took them <v Patrick Murphy>to counseling. At your at our expense, at the taxpayers expense. <v Patrick Murphy>So that was what has happened, was that someone they took a good idea.
<v Patrick Murphy>That's a problem of a lot of bureaucracy, good idea is the biological parents shouldn't <v Patrick Murphy>willy nilly lose their children. And in fact, they're the best vehicle to raise their <v Patrick Murphy>kids. But they took a good idea and just with blinders followed it <v Patrick Murphy>without saying, well, there are certain cases and many cases indeed, where they shouldn't <v Patrick Murphy>get to the kid back. <v John Callaway>In a letter to me, you suggested that you yourself had that mindset many years ago, <v John Callaway>but the circumstances changed. <v Patrick Murphy>In the 60s, I represented- I wrote a book was published in 1974 where <v Patrick Murphy>this was the point of my book. <v Patrick Murphy>And certainly I spent eight years either as a Peace Corps volunteer in Africa or in the <v Patrick Murphy>west side of Chicago as a lawyer. <v Patrick Murphy>We won some of the victories. The problem a lot of people today don't understand that the <v Patrick Murphy>system is different. The kids coming into the system are much more hard core. <v John Callaway>Is this a drug related phenomenon? <v Patrick Murphy>Roughly 80 percent of the cases my lawyers have theorized to come in, come to the <v Patrick Murphy>juvenile court on abuse, neglect, have something to do with drugs and maybe sexual abuse. <v Patrick Murphy>And that's because the mother's lover is having sex with a 6 year old daughter. <v Patrick Murphy>But there's drugs involved. He's also the mother's drug supplier.
<v Patrick Murphy>So the mother may be out and abandoned the kid so it's abandonment, but she's out in the <v Patrick Murphy>streets doing drugs. <v Patrick Murphy>So we think about 80 percent of all the neglect and abuse are directly related to drug <v Patrick Murphy>abuse, plus the fact you're getting tremendous amount of sex abuse these days you never <v Patrick Murphy>had 20 years ago. <v John Callaway>One last kind of parenthetical question, because we want to know who the players are. <v John Callaway>What does the public guardian do? What does your office do? <v Patrick Murphy>Well, we have three divisions. One division deals with the elderly, where the guard <v Patrick Murphy>guardian people who are senile, one division deals with children and divorce cases, those <v Patrick Murphy>you're not concerned with. We have 50 lawyers and 20 social workers who act as lawyers <v Patrick Murphy>for abused and neglected children in juvenile court. <v Patrick Murphy>In that respect, we've gotten in battles with the juvenile court and <v Patrick Murphy>we've sued DCFS and got many battles with them. <v John Callaway>Alright now, Judge Hamilton, let's go over and get your view, your retrospective overview <v John Callaway>of the Sarah case. What does it mean to you? <v Arthur Hamilton>Well, John, as I told your producer, before I got came on the show, <v Arthur Hamilton>I was very uh I'm reluctant to discuss the Sarah case for the simple
<v Arthur Hamilton>reason that this case is still pending in our division because it has been <v Arthur Hamilton>remanded to the original trial judge for a rehearing and <v Arthur Hamilton>it still has to be decided. <v Arthur Hamilton>And so any comments that I will make on the problem that seems to be indicated <v Arthur Hamilton>by the decision or by the comments that you and Pat have made so far <v Arthur Hamilton>will be, in a sense, limited, because, again, I have this this ini-inhibition <v Arthur Hamilton>about about commenting upon the appellate court decision. <v John Callaway>Forget about that. Can you address yourself to some of the larger issues? <v Arthur Hamilton>Well, yes, I will. <v Arthur Hamilton>For instance, first of all, we must recognize <v Arthur Hamilton>that uh we're not claiming that our juvenile court is perfect, <v Arthur Hamilton>because I think that all <v Arthur Hamilton>impartial observers who are really familiar with what the court is doing will <v Arthur Hamilton>recognize that we have have had limited resources,
<v Arthur Hamilton>that we have never had sufficient resources to do the kind of job that <v Arthur Hamilton>would be required in an ideal situation. <v John Callaway>But do you agree with the appellate court that the do not vote system is an abysmal <v John Callaway>failure? <v Arthur Hamilton>I'm sorry. No, I certainly don't agree with that. <v Arthur Hamilton>And I really would like to to go more into <v Arthur Hamilton>it why I don't, but I would suffice to say that I believe that the <v Arthur Hamilton>the the the question of of of of <v Arthur Hamilton>joining the court with the DCFS as far as <v Arthur Hamilton>the failure in a case of of the kind that's under consideration. <v Arthur Hamilton>I think it is unfair to the court. I think that people should understand. <v Arthur Hamilton>And I think that your viewers should understand that the juvenile court <v Arthur Hamilton>is an evolving institution. <v Arthur Hamilton>That is. For instance, I have been out there for for 19 years and uh <v Arthur Hamilton>to give you some idea uh so grasp of the way the court is evolving. <v Arthur Hamilton>I will point out to you that when I started in '72, we had one
<v Arthur Hamilton>judge, one courtroom dealing with neglected and abused children, one. <v Arthur Hamilton>And on-in that courtroom, we had three lawyers in there. <v Arthur Hamilton>Today we have six such trial courts dealing with these same cases. <v Arthur Hamilton>And in each of those cases, we have nine lawyers instead of three. <v John Callaway>Are you still just as overloaded and overburdened as you were before? <v Arthur Hamilton>We are more overloaded. And I will give you just quickly I'll give you some idea. <v Arthur Hamilton>In other words, the number of new the number of new cases <v Arthur Hamilton>of neglect and abuse cases that were filed are referred to the court in 19 <v Arthur Hamilton>in 1990 was 500 percent more than was <v Arthur Hamilton>referred to the court in 1972. <v Arthur Hamilton>And to deal with that, we've had in effect, we have 600 percent more <v Arthur Hamilton>judges because we have six times one. <v Arthur Hamilton>But not withstanding the fact that we have the the six judges, <v Arthur Hamilton>the actual trials of the cases completed by those six judges
<v Arthur Hamilton>in 1990 were only 41 percent of the number <v Arthur Hamilton>that I as the only judge completed in 1972. <v Arthur Hamilton>Likewise, the number of guardians that were appointed in 1990 by <v Arthur Hamilton>those six judges, we're only what were on were only <v Arthur Hamilton>were only 33 percent more. <v Arthur Hamilton>If I said 41 percent as far as the trial. <v John Callaway>The point is you're flooded. <v Arthur Hamilton>The point is I'm flooded. And the thing that must be understood <v Arthur Hamilton>is that the judges who hear cases today or face an <v Arthur Hamilton>entirely different situation. The laws have been changed. <v Arthur Hamilton>More is required of the judges by statute. <v Arthur Hamilton>In addition to that, the additional nine lawyers in the courtroom <v Arthur Hamilton>mean that aside from the fact that lawyers are now more <v Arthur Hamilton>aware and more knowledgeable about juvenile justice issues, <v Arthur Hamilton>the mere fact that they are nine of them moves that these cases are more intensively
<v Arthur Hamilton>litigated than they were in that period of time. <v John Callaway>Alright I want to go to Jeffrey Arnold and I'll reintroduce you as the administrative <v John Callaway>director of the Circuit Court of Cook County. <v John Callaway>Judge Comerford wanted you to be on this program this evening, didn't want the judge to <v John Callaway>be on alone, Pat Murphy said, fine, bring him on. <v John Callaway>What do you do and what's your responsibility in all of this? <v Jeffrey Arnold>Well, I guess my responsibility in assisting the chief judge is to help <v Jeffrey Arnold>him manage a huge court. The juvenile division is a part of a 390 <v Jeffrey Arnold>judged court. <v Jeffrey Arnold>It has an important caseload, as do the other divisions in the court. <v Jeffrey Arnold>We have been working over years to improve their situation at juvenile. <v Jeffrey Arnold>I remember the first time I walked into the juvenile court, which was, I believe early in <v Jeffrey Arnold>1968, and it wasn't in the building that you're videotape showed. <v Jeffrey Arnold>It was in a Gothic horror, as I recall. <v Jeffrey Arnold>Children came across from the audy home, handcuffed together in a daisy chain. <v Jeffrey Arnold>It was mothers screaming in the hall, 'They're taking my baby away.' We worked
<v Jeffrey Arnold>through to get a new building. And somehow it's it's interesting, as I recall it, that <v Jeffrey Arnold>the building that the people are now complaining about started out to replace <v Jeffrey Arnold>a ten courtroom facility and ended up being a 10 courtroom facility with a four story <v Jeffrey Arnold>jail. <v Jeffrey Arnold>We've been working, I think, to remedy that as well. <v Jeffrey Arnold>And part of this is as a background, because none of these things change overnight. <v Jeffrey Arnold>There is under construction this moment of 14 courtrooms, seven <v Jeffrey Arnold>story addition to the juvenile division. <v John Callaway>When will it be finished? <v Jeffrey Arnold>Well, it's really a good question. I think we're looking at about two and a half years. <v John Callaway>Pat Murphy, let's go back and get your basic overview critique of juvenile court. <v John Callaway>Aside from the let's not come back a lot on overcrowding that's been established, the <v John Callaway>caseload. What about the what about the training and quality of the judges? <v John Callaway>What about the the whole mix of criminal and neglect? <v Patrick Murphy>And you talk about the quantity you're leaving out in the equation. <v Patrick Murphy>And that is that the average caseload for neglected abuse is over 3,000
<v Patrick Murphy>per judge. The average caseload in criminal court is about four or 500 per <v Patrick Murphy>judge. If you go to the chancery and law divisions, it's well under 1,000 divorce, <v Patrick Murphy>four or 500 county again, well under 1,000. <v Patrick Murphy>And I've practiced I've argued in the US Supreme Court and in every court on down. <v Patrick Murphy>The most difficult court I've ever practiced in is in Judge Hamilton's courtrooms. <v John Callaway>Why? <v Arthur Hamilton>Because a judge has 3,000 cases, he has maybe 50 or 60 cases a day. <v Arthur Hamilton>She's got to make a decision which is going to affect the child for a lifetime, a family <v Arthur Hamilton>for a lifetime, in maybe three or four minutes. <v Arthur Hamilton>That's pressure and stress, in the Supreme Court you get six months to brief and argue <v Arthur Hamilton>one issue. <v Arthur Hamilton>And yet we give Judge Hamilton no resources. <v Arthur Hamilton>And that's because there's no clout. When you're talking about a courtroom of poor kids, <v Arthur Hamilton>primarily black and brown. They don't have the clout. <v Arthur Hamilton>The clouted lawyers practice in Chancery, in the law division, in the criminal division <v Arthur Hamilton>and the county division. So that's where the resources are. <v John Callaway>So right there, just for starters here, it's the bottom of the barrel in the court
<v John Callaway>system. <v Patrick Murphy>It is backwater and it's backwater, it also because, I know Judge Hamilton disagrees with <v Patrick Murphy>me on this, I don't think it should be part of a criminal justice system. <v Patrick Murphy>When you're talk about abuse and neglect, it's civil, you're talking about taking kids <v Patrick Murphy>away. <v John Callaway>You want to separate those out? You want them in a different building different? <v Patrick Murphy>Different building, different everything about it. It shouldn't be- but also, they need <v Patrick Murphy>more resources. You can't, It there were the six best judges in the system, and the <v Patrick Murphy>quality's improved greatly in the last couple of years, primarily because of Judge <v Patrick Murphy>Hamilton's consistent lobbying. <v Patrick Murphy>But when you have six judges hearing this many cases, there's going to be chaos and <v Patrick Murphy>there's going to be neglect. <v John Callaway>You know, it's interesting. You give him cred-you're not uh nobody can accuse you of <v John Callaway>being his buddy and you give him credit for the work that he's done. <v John Callaway>And yet the Chicago Council of Lawyers has written to Judge Comberford the Chief Justice <v John Callaway>of the Circuit Court requesting that he reassign Judge Hamilton. <v John Callaway>They say he's a great trial judge, but that he doesn't bring the leadership. <v John Callaway>You're saying that he- <v Patrick Murphy>I want to hog the camera for one second. <v Patrick Murphy>The Chicago Council of Lawyers is allegedly a liberal progressive group of lawyers. <v Patrick Murphy>I have never seen any of them in the management part of the
<v Patrick Murphy>practice of the juvenile court. They all work for large fancy law firms. <v Patrick Murphy>They practice in downtown courtrooms. <v Patrick Murphy>They never get out there. The ACLU criticized Judge Hamilton, their lawyers who do <v Patrick Murphy>juvenile work practice in federal court. They bring class actions. <v Patrick Murphy>They don't work out there. And so why did they criticize Judge Hamilton? <v Patrick Murphy>He's got six judges. He doesn't ask for six judges, <v Patrick Murphy>he's asked for the quantity or quality. He needs more. <v Patrick Murphy>They could criticize the folks downtown, but they don't because they're afraid to do <v Patrick Murphy>that, because they've got to practice in those divisions. These are the folks who decide <v Patrick Murphy>how many judges Judge Hamilton get. <v Patrick Murphy>The Chicago Council of lawyers only criticize Judge Hamilton. <v Patrick Murphy>I wanna go a step further, and that is that Judge Hamilton is one of the two black <v Patrick Murphy>presiding judges in the whole system. <v Patrick Murphy>We expect blacks in our society to be superstars. <v Patrick Murphy>They can't be mortals if they have a managerial position like the rest of us and make a <v Patrick Murphy>few mistakes. So they go after him. <v Patrick Murphy>Why don't they go after someone else? <v Patrick Murphy>The people downtown who give them the number. And I just think it's to me, it was the <v Patrick Murphy>worst kind of abuse when these lawyers don't even practice there, they see the results
<v Patrick Murphy>the results are bad. <v John Callaway>Yep. <v Patrick Murphy>But you've got to look at the numbers and you got to look what's going on. <v John Callaway>Alright, aside from the overwhelming caseload, there is the issue that's been set <v John Callaway>on the table by Mr. Murphy of the separation of criminal <v John Callaway>and neglect and dependency cases. <v John Callaway>Mr. Murphy is arguing that they should be heard in a different building. <v John Callaway>Does that merit? <v Arthur Hamilton>I think there is there is a certain merit to his position, <v Arthur Hamilton>but I don't agree with the conclusion at this point in time. <v Arthur Hamilton>For this reason. First of all, I'd like to to to to note that <v Arthur Hamilton>we now have in the present building, we now have the neglected <v Arthur Hamilton>and abused children confined to one side of the building and the delinquent <v Arthur Hamilton>calendars where they deal with children who are who are charged with a criminal offense <v Arthur Hamilton>on the other side of the building. And we must give Mr. Mr. Murphy credit. <v Arthur Hamilton>This is due to Mr. mr. Mr. Mr. Murphy's urgings. <v John Callaway>And how long ago did that separation take place? <v John Callaway>That segregation. <v Arthur Hamilton>Hmm Pat how long before that?
<v Patrick Murphy>When we took over the GL's office four years ago. <v Patrick Murphy>Four years ago. <v John Callaway>So that's been- is that is that a step in the right direction given reality? <v Patrick Murphy>Oh sure, and the next step whichJudge Hamilton is about to talk about it's a step in the <v Patrick Murphy>right direction,. <v John Callaway>Which is? <v Patrick Murphy>But still not far enough. <v John Callaway>Okay, but which is? <v Arthur Hamilton>Which is the which is the annex that we are going-we hope to have in two and a half <v Arthur Hamilton>years, which we will which we will, which will be exclusively <v Arthur Hamilton>neglect and abuse cases. <v Arthur Hamilton>So they will be out of the building, so to speak. <v Arthur Hamilton>But the problem with the suggestion that they not <v Arthur Hamilton>be in the building is that given the present circumstances and the present <v Arthur Hamilton>resources that we now have available, there is a demand for <v Arthur Hamilton>many more resources in terms of additional courtrooms, <v Arthur Hamilton>probation staff and so forth. <v Arthur Hamilton>That, in my opinion, take precedence over the idea, over the idea <v Arthur Hamilton>of a separate location, because the separate location will involve decentralization <v Arthur Hamilton>of our files. Logistically, it would create a great deal of problem.
<v John Callaway>So it's a logistical problem? <v Arthur Hamilton>It's a logistical problem. Maybe some day in the future. <v John Callaway>Alrght, Mr. Arnold, let's go, however, back to this, this notion of treating the juvenile <v John Callaway>court system as the backwater of the courts. <v John Callaway>I mean, Mr. Murphy, it just seems to me are overwhelming. <v John Callaway>What's the politics of this? What do you have to send a message to Governor <v John Callaway>Edgar? Do-does the message need to be sent to Mr. Feiglin of the county board, who <v John Callaway>finances and leads to do something about this? <v Jeffrey Arnold>Well financing, the buildings are financed by the county, <v Jeffrey Arnold>and the county is spending a great deal of money trying to remedy the defect. <v Jeffrey Arnold>The judges are funded by the state. <v Jeffrey Arnold>And I might add, it seems ironic to us that at a time when everyone's saying <v Jeffrey Arnold>we're short of resources, that we're involved in a judicial redistricting bill that in a <v Jeffrey Arnold>sense cuts down our ability to replace judges who leave. <v Jeffrey Arnold>The census just deprived us deprived us of another five judges. <v Jeffrey Arnold>And if you've noticed what's going on in the legislature, spending more money on courts <v Jeffrey Arnold>is not high on their list of things to do.
<v Jeffrey Arnold>So um we're going to have to make do with the manpower we have. <v Jeffrey Arnold>And it's being stretched in all directions. <v Jeffrey Arnold>We have a county jail that's grossly overcrowded. <v Jeffrey Arnold>We've opened up 8 night narcotics courts. <v Jeffrey Arnold>The drug problem is not merely affecting the juvenile <v Jeffrey Arnold>aspect of things. And everywhere we look, someone you're saying ours is the backwater <v Jeffrey Arnold>of the center. <v Patrick Murphy>Except the pie, our pie is too small. When you've got three with no judge should have a <v Patrick Murphy>caseload of these types of cases of over 3,000 per judge. <v Patrick Murphy>When a chancery judge has 700. <v John Callaway>Mr. Murphy, your point, just to underscore. <v Patrick Murphy>Let the corporations let the corporations who deal with how much how many widgets and how <v Patrick Murphy>many dollars that fight over these disenchant to let them have a little more <v Patrick Murphy>time to wait before their case is tried. And let the let the the kid who's been abused <v Patrick Murphy>and who is with DCFS and gotten sent from foster home to foster home. <v Patrick Murphy>Let that kid have a better shot. <v Patrick Murphy>All I want is a bigger you know, there's only I agree with Jeff. <v Patrick Murphy>There is only the pie is only so big. <v Patrick Murphy>I just want someone else to have a smaller piece and us tohave a larger.
<v John Callaway>And you're also talking about the front end of the system that is children. <v John Callaway>Because if you if you screw it up at this level at the age of two, three, four, five and <v John Callaway>six, then you've got a lifetime. Do you not have harm? <v Patrick Murphy>The situation, I think the situation. <v Patrick Murphy>So bad with respect to our children in our major cities that it's going to <v Patrick Murphy>take a generation of hard work of all of us to overcome by all of us to overcome. <v John Callaway>Do you get any sense that Governor Edgar has a sense of priority about this? <v John Callaway>Do you believe him when he says he wants to redo the Department of Children and Families <v John Callaway>Services? <v Patrick Murphy>All I know is that Edgar appointed a previous person <v Patrick Murphy>who ran for political office and lost as the Director of Children and Family Services. <v Patrick Murphy>And I think that if he had a commitment to it, he would go out and find an experienced, <v Patrick Murphy>top notch child welfare person, which, by the way, the guy that had the job in <v Patrick Murphy>the last six months of the Thompson administration was Jess McDonnell. <v Patrick Murphy>He was a child welfare guy, an ex-Vietnam, a decorated Vietnam vet, a tough guy, knew <v Patrick Murphy>what he was doing, was kicked out in favor of a politician. <v Patrick Murphy>So, no, I don't think he's got a commitment. <v John Callaway>Alright, on that note, we want to thank Judge Arthur M.
Series
Chicago Tonight
Episode Number
No. 8171
Episode
Juvenile Court
Producing Organization
WTTW (Television station : Chicago, Ill.)
Contributing Organization
The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia (Athens, Georgia)
AAPB ID
cpb-aacip-526-8p5v699b3c
If you have more information about this item than what is given here, or if you have concerns about this record, we want to know! Contact us, indicating the AAPB ID (cpb-aacip-526-8p5v699b3c).
Description
Episode Description
This episode of Chicago Tonight was hosted by John Callaway and features a discussion of the juvenile court system in Chicago. Those invited to discuss are lawyer Cook County Public Guardian Patrick Murphy; Arthur N. Hamilton, the presiding judge of the juvenile division of the Cook County Circuit Court; and the administrative director of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Jeffrey M. Arnold. Reporter Chitra Ragavan also gives a short historical background on Chicago's juvenile justice system, including the role of Jane Addams. Ragavan interviews Mary Ann Johnson, current director of the Hull House Museum; Elaine Thigpen, a caseworker in the Public Guardian's Office; and James Jordan, superintendent of the Cook County Temporary Juvenile Detention Center.
Series Description
"CHICAGO MATTERS, a three-year-long project exploring issues of concern to the community, focused on children in 1991. A unique mixture of programming examines some of the [problems] facing children today and offered viable solutions. "Included in this series are PROTECT YOURSELF: TEACHING YOUR CHILDREN ABOUT AIDS, which addresses one of the leading threats to our youth and promotes prevention through education; WHAT'S OUT THER FOR J.R', which explores the state of the social service networks that provide help to youths in crisis; the CHICAGO MATTERS TOWN MEETING examines the community support systems available to children, bringing together city officials, park district representatives, parents, children and child development experts in a live 'town meeting' setting."--1991 Peabody Awards entry form.
Description
"CHICAGO MATTERS, a three-year-long project exploring issues of concern to the community, focused on children in 1991. A unique mixture of programming examines some of the [problems] facing children today and offered viable solutions. "Included in this series are PROTECT YOURSELF: TEACHING YOUR CHILDREN ABOUT AIDS, which addresses one of the leading threats to our youth and promotes prevention through education; WHAT'S OUT THER FOR J.R?, which explores the state of the social service networks that provide help to youths in crisis; the CHICAGO MATTERS TOWN MEETING examines the community support systems available to children, bringing together city officials, park district representatives, parents, children and child development experts in a live 'town meeting' setting."--1991 Peabody Awards entry form.
Broadcast Date
1991
Asset type
Episode
Media type
Moving Image
Duration
00:29:09.481
Embed Code
Copy and paste this HTML to include AAPB content on your blog or webpage.
Credits
Producing Organization: WTTW (Television station : Chicago, Ill.)
AAPB Contributor Holdings
The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia
Identifier: cpb-aacip-d558a26fbf2 (Filename)
Format: U-matic
If you have a copy of this asset and would like us to add it to our catalog, please contact us.
Citations
Chicago: “Chicago Tonight; No. 8171; Juvenile Court,” 1991, The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC, accessed June 28, 2022, http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-526-8p5v699b3c.
MLA: “Chicago Tonight; No. 8171; Juvenile Court.” 1991. The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Web. June 28, 2022. <http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-526-8p5v699b3c>.
APA: Chicago Tonight; No. 8171; Juvenile Court. Boston, MA: The Walter J. Brown Media Archives & Peabody Awards Collection at the University of Georgia, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-526-8p5v699b3c