thumbnail of Harvard Book Store; WGBH Forum Network; Stephen Greenblatt: Shakespeare's Freedom
Transcript
Hide -
This transcript was received from a third party and/or generated by a computer. Its accuracy has not been verified. If this transcript has significant errors that should be corrected, let us know, so we can add it to FIX IT+.
Yeah. You know. Yes. Oh it's. It's it. I don't I think he did I mean and this is that's a very it's a very good question and I don't have a very good answer for it I don't I I would like to say Shakespeare was a Jeffersonian Democrat but I don't think he was I mean that is a he. I don't think he got it that way I don't think it was it. I don't think it I think he thought that that election was interest in elections lots of the plays are there are a surprising number the players are interested in elections but the election seemed to Shakespear occasions in which large numbers of people are persuaded to vote against their interests. And the end he found that the kind of distressing weird phenomena is interested it is a phenomenon but he he seems to extremely skeptical about their little glimpses moments in which you can see it might work but in his in his works but I don't think he just thinks of it as a particularly better. He doesn't get that all systems are miserable but democracy is a better system than the
other available ones which is what I guess most of us. Believe in one form or other. I don't think that wasn't didn't seem to be available to him to for whatever reason or he didn't think his way through that. So I think he did actually bump up against the kind of uncertainty he thought that you couldn't withdraw from power. That said I think he thought that the philosophical dissolution of the philosophical academies which is let's get away from this they just felt that he was drawn to the garden. It's necessary to cultivate your own garden to think of Voltaire but it's a long tradition goes all the way back. I think he thought that was a very bad idea because someone was going to exercise power is probably going to be much worse if you withdraw. But I don't think he believed it was ever going to be very good. And I don't I think he he I had when I thought of different kind of remarks to make tonight I I printed up a couple of moments in which freedom was used in as a term in Shakespeare. All of you know what
what Caesar Caesar's dying words were Yes. And Shakespeare is to you Caesar whether this famous his famous or.
Collection
Harvard Book Store
Series
WGBH Forum Network
Program
Stephen Greenblatt: Shakespeare's Freedom
Contributing Organization
WGBH (Boston, Massachusetts)
AAPB ID
cpb-aacip/15-pn8x921s78
If you have more information about this item than what is given here, or if you have concerns about this record, we want to know! Contact us, indicating the AAPB ID (cpb-aacip/15-pn8x921s78).
Description
Description
Shakespeare scholar Stephen Greenblatt discusses his new book, Shakespeare's Freedom.Shakespeare lived in a world of absolutes--of claims for the absolute authority of scripture, monarch, and God, and the authority of fathers over wives and children, the old over the young, and the gentle over the baseborn. Stephen Greenblatt, author of the best-selling Will in the World, shows that Shakespeare was strikingly averse to such absolutes and constantly probed the possibility of freedom from them. Again and again, Shakespeare confounds the designs and pretensions of kings, generals, and churchmen. His aversion to absolutes even leads him to probe the exalted and seemingly limitless passions of his lovers.Greenblatt explores this rich theme by addressing four of Shakespeare's preoccupations across all the genres in which he worked. He first considers the idea of beauty in Shakespeare's works, specifically his challenge to the cult of featureless perfection and his interest in distinguishing marks. He then turns to Shakespeare's interest in murderous hatred, most famously embodied in Shylock but seen also in the character Bernardine in Measure for Measure. Next Greenblatt considers the idea of Shakespearean authority--that is, Shakespeare's deep sense of the ethical ambiguity of power, including his own. Ultimately, Greenblatt takes up Shakespearean autonomy, in particular the freedom of artists, guided by distinctive forms of perception, to live by their own laws and to claim that their creations are singularly unconstrained.
Date
2010-11-15
Topics
Literature
History
Subjects
Art & Architecture; History
Media type
Moving Image
Duration
00:02:18
Embed Code
Copy and paste this HTML to include AAPB content on your blog or webpage.
Credits
Distributor: WGBH
Speaker2: Greenblatt, Stephen
AAPB Contributor Holdings
WGBH
Identifier: f3d264d5e4c2c3c091e9c25a5f657887369f6a42 (ArtesiaDAM UOI_ID)
Format: video/quicktime
Duration: 00:01:38
If you have a copy of this asset and would like us to add it to our catalog, please contact us.
Citations
Chicago: “Harvard Book Store; WGBH Forum Network; Stephen Greenblatt: Shakespeare's Freedom,” 2010-11-15, WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC, accessed November 7, 2024, http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-pn8x921s78.
MLA: “Harvard Book Store; WGBH Forum Network; Stephen Greenblatt: Shakespeare's Freedom.” 2010-11-15. WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Web. November 7, 2024. <http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-pn8x921s78>.
APA: Harvard Book Store; WGBH Forum Network; Stephen Greenblatt: Shakespeare's Freedom. Boston, MA: WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-pn8x921s78