thumbnail of Teachers' Domain; Civil Rights; Simple Justice: A Handful of Lawyers
Transcript
Hide -
This transcript was received from a third party and/or generated by a computer. Its accuracy has not been verified. If this transcript has significant errors that should be corrected, let us know, so we can add it using our FIX IT+ crowdsourcing tool.
All right now Mr. Marshall you are from Baltimore aren't you. Yes. Oh my goodness. Why are you OK Mr. Marshall to attend our little Howard Law School and not going to wish in free to the prestigious University of Maryland. I happen to be a Negro. I say. And negroes not attend the University of Maryland is that correct. No sir. I mean yes a negro is going to Maryland. Why is that. Who knows what that signifies. A lawsuit down south somewhere in Louisiana wants out. That's right 1896. What was it about Jim Crow.
That's a label not an explanation. Segregation so Plessy. Mr. Hill is why you arrive here from Richmond Virginia in a racially segregated train. Plessy Mr. Durham is why no one in this room can eat in most of the restaurants here in the capital of the world's greatest democracy. And Plessy Mr. Maher show is the reason it is against the law in 17 states for black children to go to school with white children. There are two kinds of lawyers gentleman. There are my kind and there are parasites on society. My kind of lawyer is going to be a social engineer. My kind of lawyer is going to be a fighter for social change. My kind of lawyer is going to find out everything there is to know about Plessy because Plessy is a dragon
gentleman and my kind of lawyer is going to go out and slay it. Thats why youre here Mr Marshall. Or it better be. And if its not you better pack up and leave right now because you will not make it from the start. Dean used to head us up and ogling the ins and outs of segregation cases spatially Plessy. Now the accommodations in the Negro call are the same as those in the Whites Only cause they are separate but equal no objective observer would call those accommodations equal Yana. That's not the point. My client Mr. Homer Plessy preferred to sit in a car designated whites only and was arrested in violation of his constitutional rights. His client Homer Plessy purposely broke the laws of the state of Louisiana but that law requires whites to sit in one car negro sit in another. That's discriminatory. It violates the 14th Amendment to the Constitution as they will refresh my memory Tell me exactly what the 14th Amendment says. Exactly. Most of your
entire case rests upon I don't think that's unreasonable. No State shall make or enforce any law which abridges the privileges of citizens of the United States. Nor shall any state denied to any person the equal protection of the law. OK counsel. What is the 14th Amendment have to say about the segregation law that Mr Plus he broke the 14th Amendment says to the state of Louisiana can't legislate away the rights and privileges given him by the federal government and just what the right so we're talking about the right to be treated the same as any other person not as a second class citizen a social. Parasite. I mean social inferior. Look under the 14th Amendment the law can't deprive us of freedoms other people having you know simply because we're negroes. Or can it. The Supreme Court ruled eight to one of they can keep you from going places white people can go. Racially separate facilities may be maintained by the states as long
as they are equal. Segregation is not discrimination. So. Everybody's equal. But. Negroes can be treated like outcast. That's that's just cream courts as a guarantee of equality has limits it does not require social equality but I don't see how that comes with the 14th amendment that was self-evident self-evident that that white people are more equal than Negro. Of course thought that was all in your mind Mr. Marshall. And I quote. The assumption that enforced separation stamps the colored race was a badge of inferiority they said is soley because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. Wait for me Mr. Marshall. Lose your temper lose your case for 35 years the Supreme Court of the United States has resisted every attempt to overcome segregation. I say See. Question every attempt to overturn the
last vestiges of the slave codes I see question every attempt to open that door just a little bit so that we could become the people that we know we can become. By saying See. If you survive here gentlemen you will join a handful of Negro lawyers in this whole country who have been rigorously trained and with that distinction comes a truly enormous responsibility. We have to change the laws that keep people down. We must pave the way to the future. Without education there is no hope for our people. Hope our future is lost. So we must use the power and the logic of the law to stop the humiliation and the crippling of our children in disgraceful segregated schools. And we're going to have to accomplish this in the face of a Congress dominated by segregationist. We have to face the fact that no president since Abraham Lincoln has fought for Negro rights. And what that means is this. We're going to have to go to court. To the highest court in the
land to destroy Plessy. And we're going to have to be twice as good as the white lawyers that oppose us at every turn. We must not give in. We must not fail. Gentlemen congratulations to all of you. Mine I am so fivers. The men of the class of 1933.
Please note: This content is only available at GBH and the Library of Congress, either due to copyright restrictions or because this content has not yet been reviewed for copyright or privacy issues. For information about on location research, click here.
Series
Teachers' Domain
Program
Civil Rights
Title
Simple Justice: A Handful of Lawyers
Producing Organization
WGBH Educational Foundation
Contributing Organization
WGBH (Boston, Massachusetts)
AAPB ID
cpb-aacip/15-4f1mg7fw13
If you have more information about this item than what is given here, or if you have concerns about this record, we want to know! Contact us, indicating the AAPB ID (cpb-aacip/15-4f1mg7fw13).
Description
Description
This segment from American Experience: "Simple Justice" profiles Charles Houston's strategy for attacking segregation and how he trained the legal team that eventually argued the Brown case.
Description
See related asset "osi04_vid_lawyers_Backgrounder.xml"
Description
What was Charles Hamilton Houston trying to achieve, and why did he prepare a selected group of lawyers?How did he motivate them?What did the students learn by re-enacting the Plessy v. Ferguson case in class?
Description
On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated schools were unconstitutional. What happened that day reflected years of work, dating back to the law school days of the NAACP attorneys and the professor who trained them, Charles Houston. This video segment, from American Experience: "Simple Justice", looks at Houston's role in preparing the NAACP attorneys and the strategies they would use later in court to attack segregation. Also available from the "Simple Justice" series: Social Science EvidenceThe Trial BeginsArguing the Fourteenth AmendmentMarshall's Closing ArgumentsJustice Warren Reads the Decision
Topics
Social Issues
Subjects
Civil Rights and Civil Liberties; civil rights movement :: historical figure :: Thurgood Marshall; civil rights movement :: desegregation :: schools; society :: social change; society :: government :: U.S. Supreme Court :: cases :: Plessy v. Ferguson; society :: government :: U.S. Supreme Court :: cases :: Brown v. Board of Education; society :: government :: laws :: promote justice; social studies; civil rights movement :: group :: civil rights lawyers; civil rights movement :: desegregation :: schools :: higher education; civil rights movement :: desegregation; civil rights :: segregation; civil rights :: segregation :: schools :: public schools; society :: citizenship :: rights :: equality :: education; society :: citizenship :: rights :: equal opportunity
Rights
Rights Note:Streaming only,Rights:,Rights Credit:1993 New Images Productions. Directed by: Helaine Head. To purchase Simple Justice, please visit www.newimagesprod.com.,Rights Type:All,Rights Coverage:,Rights Holder:WGBH Educational Foundation
Media type
Moving Image
Duration
00:07:02
Credits
Producing Organization: WGBH Educational Foundation
Publisher: Teachers' Domain
AAPB Contributor Holdings
WGBH
Identifier: e80a6ba69dc090aece28f20e0ba41354d660b3fc (ArtesiaDAM UOI_ID)
Format: video/quicktime
Color: Color
Duration: 00:04:22
If you have a copy of this asset and would like us to add it to our catalog, please contact us.
Citations
Chicago: “Teachers' Domain; Civil Rights; Simple Justice: A Handful of Lawyers,” WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC, accessed May 29, 2025, http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-4f1mg7fw13.
MLA: “Teachers' Domain; Civil Rights; Simple Justice: A Handful of Lawyers.” WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Web. May 29, 2025. <http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-4f1mg7fw13>.
APA: Teachers' Domain; Civil Rights; Simple Justice: A Handful of Lawyers. Boston, MA: WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-4f1mg7fw13